🏒@HockeyBangers2026-27 projections

Overview

@HockeyBangers

2026-27 Projection

Joel Edmundson

LAK · Age 33.1 · 🇨🇦 Canada · 6′5″, 221 lb · Draft 2011, 46th overall (STL)
LAKteam
Dposition
185position rank
512skater rank
-21overall
-51offense
29peripherals

Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.

Per 82 GP2026-27projection adj2025-2682 GPH242 GPH140 GPPrev 3187 GP · 3y
TOI18.6618.4818.2817.3819.14
PP TOI0.080.080.060.100.10
G32-044
A1621202213
PTS1923192717
PPP13240
SOG981049111890
PIM2325143745
Hits959710094128
Blocks11411113883132

Sample: 82 GP · 1,257 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates

Positional rankingDefense · league-wide (of 303)
offenseperipheralsvalue over replacement

Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.

Context-adjusted (▲/▼ vs the rate-model baseline): Hits trimmed to 95. His per-82 hits ran 150, 125, 113 and 96 across 2022-26, a steady decline, and the engine projects 103 by leaning on the earlier seasons. 95 follows last season's 96.

Metrics worth highlighting

The charts that move this projection — where he broke from his own 3-year rate, where the season split in half, and where we’re taking the number next year
Second-half surge
BLK
11422-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5

Blocks ran at a 138 pace in the second half after 83 in the first, per 82 games.

Second-half fade
PIM
2322-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5

Penalty minutes ran at a 14 pace in the second half after 37 in the first, per 82 games.

Below his 3-year rate
iSH%
2.1122-2323-2424-2525-26

iSH% ran 52% below his 3-year rate last season (2.11 against 4.39).

We project it down
A
1622-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5

We’re projecting assists 24% below last season, 21 to 16.

Picked automatically from every chart on this card, ranked by how far each number moved. Each claim is measured off the chart drawn beside it.

Similar & complementary players

Similar makeup Defense
Closest across all seven categories — match % is the whole-profile fit
Complementary Defense
Same position, opposite profile — strong where Joel Edmundson is weak or average, light where he’s strong
  • Quinn HughesD · Minnesota Wildcovers 3
    fills: A, PPP, SOG
  • Zach WerenskiD · Columbus Blue Jacketscovers 3
    fills: SOG, A, PPP
  • Cale MakarD · Colorado Avalanchecovers 3
    fills: A, PPP, SOG
  • Evan BouchardD · Edmonton Oilerscovers 3
    fills: A, PPP, SOG
Profile shape — per-82 category values vs the league p99 for the position (same scale as the hero bars)
This player
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
the profile below
vs Similar
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
similar players hug the shape
vs Complementary
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
complements fill the gaps

Deployment

Deployment projection — next-year TOI & PP TOI vs the last two years (the role that drives every count)
Coaching
2026-27 · Peter Laviolette (LAK) new voice
Last year: Jim Hiller Q1-Q4 · fired Mar → D.J. Smith interim · end Q4 — in-season change
Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
TOI18.6618.4819.14-3%
5v5 TOI15.6815.3316.19-5%
PP TOI0.080.080.10-19%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  21 · 19 · 22 · 20
TOI*
3-yr 19.1418.44Q1Q2Q3Q4
5v5 TOI
3-yr 16.1915.93Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP TOI
3-yr 0.100.08Q1Q2Q3Q4
*Total TOI by quarter reconstructs 5v5+PP quarterly totals plus a held-flat season PK/GP — NST has no all-strength quarterly export. Level is accurate; quarter-to-quarter movement comes from 5v5+PP.
By season — year over year
TOI
18.6622-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
5v5 TOI
15.6822-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
PP TOI
0.0822-2323-2424-2525-2626-27

Shooting — volume & conversion

How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
SOG/604.504.733.65+30%
G/600.130.100.16-38%
iSH%3.252.114.39-52%
ixG/600.230.15+58%
iCF/6011.659.16+27%
iSCF/602.631.97+34%
iHDCF/600.530.30+77%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  21 · 19 · 22 · 20
SOG/60
3-yr 3.654.90Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSH%
3-yr 4.390.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
ixG/60
3-yr 0.150.34Q1Q2Q3Q4
iCF/60
3-yr 9.1612.24Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSCF/60
3-yr 1.973.77Q1Q2Q3Q4
iHDCF/60
3-yr 0.300.94Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
SOG/60
4.7322-2323-2424-2525-26
iSH%
2.1122-2323-2424-2525-26
ixG/60
0.2322-2323-2424-2525-26
iCF/60
11.6522-2323-2424-2525-26
iSCF/60
2.6322-2323-2424-2525-26
iHDCF/60
0.5322-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
G
322-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
SOG
9822-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
TailwindGoals projected UP: iSH% cratered to 2.1% vs 4.4% 3-yr while 5v5 ixG/60 0.23 (27th pct league-wide) held/rose — the chances say the finishing rebounds toward 3.3%, lifting the goal rate ~28%.
TailwindShot volume up 30% (5v5 SOG/60 4.73 vs 3.65) — volume is the repeatable half, so this raises the goal ceiling.
TailwindTrajectory: 5v5 ixG/60 climbed 0.17→0.29 across the year — process trending the right way into next season.
RiskAge 33 — modest past-prime drag on scoring rates.

Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense

Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
on-ice SH%9.709.719.64+1%
IPP30.6332.2123.43+37%
1A/600.230.240.18+35%
2A/600.360.530.28+90%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  21 · 19 · 22 · 20
1A/60
3-yr 0.180.56Q1Q2Q3Q4
2A/60
3-yr 0.280.38Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
1A/60
0.2422-2323-2424-2525-26
2A/60
0.5322-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
A
1622-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
PTS
1922-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
RiskIPP spiked to 32.2% vs 23.4% 3-yr — point participation this far above baseline rarely holds; assist share likely gives a little back.
TailwindShot-driving up (5v5 iCF/60 11.65 vs 9.16) — real creation underneath, so don't over-regress the helpers.
TailwindHigh-danger setups up (iHDCF/60 0.53 vs 0.30) — the dangerous chances that turn into primary assists are trending up.
RiskAssist gain leans on secondary helpers (2A/60 0.53 vs 3-yr 0.28) — the least repeatable slice; projected back toward baseline.
ContextDefenseman — weight transition/PP facilitation over raw 2A; secondary assists read a touch better for D than forwards.

Power play

PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.

Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PP TOI0.080.080.10-19%
PP iSH%n/a0.00
PP SOG/601.680.006.73-100%
PP ixG/600.000.19-100%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  21 · 19 · 22 · 20
PP TOI/GP
3-yr 0.100.08Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP SOG/60
3-yr 6.730.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP ixG/60
3-yr 0.190.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PP TOI/GP
0.0822-2323-2424-2525-26
PP SOG/60
0.0022-2323-2424-2525-26
PP ixG/60
0.0022-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PPP
122-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPG
022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPA
222-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. PPG and PPA are the 2 halves of the PPP above them, split by the projection's own goal/assist mix. PP-only, so the halves are exact.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextPP role steady at ~0.1 PP TOI/gp.

Physical — PIM · hits · blocks

Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PIMs/600.981.101.47-25%
Hits/604.224.065.01-19%
Blks/604.514.494.18+7%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  21 · 19 · 22 · 20
PIMs/60
3-yr 1.470.75Q1Q2Q3Q4
Hits/60
3-yr 5.014.33Q1Q2Q3Q4
Blks/60
3-yr 4.184.71Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PIMs/60
1.1022-2323-2424-2525-26
Hits/60
4.0622-2323-2424-2525-26
Blks/60
4.4922-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PIM
2322-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
HITS
9522-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
BLK
11422-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextHits role-stable at 4.06/60 (50th pct league-wide) → 4.22 projected.
TailwindBlocks surging late: Q4 4.71/60 and 2nd-half 5.58 vs a 4.49 season rate (4.18 3-yr) (88th pct league-wide) — reads as a real role/confidence step, so projected UP to 4.51/60, weighting the finish over the 3-yr baseline.