Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2637 GP | H220 GP | H117 GP | Prev 3224 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 20.59 | 20.30 | 19.47 | 19.90 | 21.25 |
| PP TOI | 0.16 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.13 | 0.50 |
| G | 3 | 2 | -0 | 5 | 4 |
| A | 16 | 13 | 4 | 24 | 18 |
| PTS | 19 | 16 | 4 | 29 | 22 |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| SOG | 115 | 100 | 86 | 116 | 128 |
| PIM | 27 | 13 | 16 | 10 | 34 |
| Hits | 29 | 24 | 27 | 21 | 32 |
| Blocks | 136 | 177 | 160 | 198 | 126 |
Sample: 37 GP · 631 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Assists ran at a 4 pace in the second half after 24 in the first, per 82 games.
1A/60 finished the year 71% below where it started (0.63 in the first half, 0.18 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
Blks/60 ran 37% above his 3-year rate last season (5.13 against 3.74).
PIMs/60 ran 52% below his 3-year rate last season (0.57 against 1.18).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 20.59 | 20.30 | 21.25 | -4% |
| 5v5 TOI | 17.20 | 17.06 | 17.63 | -3% |
| PP TOI | 0.16 | 0.11 | 0.50 | -78% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 4.24 | 4.28 | 4.73 | -9% |
| G/60 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.08 | +31% |
| iSH% | 1.97 | 2.34 | 1.61 | +45% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.22 | 0.19 | +14% |
| iCF/60 | – | 8.27 | 12.06 | -31% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 2.95 | 3.07 | -4% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 0.86 | 0.41 | +110% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 5.40 | 5.05 | 7.62 | -34% |
| IPP | 42.90 | 46.85 | 28.58 | +64% |
| 1A/60 | 0.36 | 0.38 | 0.32 | +19% |
| 2A/60 | 0.23 | 0.19 | 0.27 | -30% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.16 | 0.11 | 0.50 | -78% |
| PP iSH% | – | n/a | 8.27 | |
| PP SOG/60 | 1.60 | 0.00 | 6.39 | -100% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.00 | 0.49 | -100% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 0.77 | 0.57 | 1.18 | -52% |
| Hits/60 | 1.05 | 0.95 | 1.17 | -19% |
| Blks/60 | 4.52 | 5.13 | 3.74 | +37% |