Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2675 GP | H239 GP | H136 GP | Prev 3226 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 17.84 | 17.51 | 16.54 | 17.79 | 20.15 |
| PP TOI | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.07 |
| G | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| A | 14 | 15 | 13 | 18 | 16 |
| PTS | 19 | 17 | 15 | 20 | 22 |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SOG | 76 | 68 | 68 | 67 | 95 |
| PIM | 61 | 83 | 65 | 102 | 69 |
| Hits | 86 | 95 | 75 | 117 | 131 |
| Blocks | 140 | 128 | 127 | 129 | 164 |
Sample: 75 GP · 1,132 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
iSH% ran 48% below his 3-year rate last season (3.51 against 6.72).
Hits ran at a 75 pace in the second half after 117 in the first, per 82 games.
Assists ran at a 13 pace in the second half after 18 in the first, per 82 games.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 17.84 | 17.51 | 20.15 | -13% |
| 5v5 TOI | 14.83 | 15.10 | 17.32 | -13% |
| PP TOI | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.07 | -39% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 3.13 | 3.13 | 3.66 | -15% |
| G/60 | 0.15 | 0.11 | 0.25 | -55% |
| iSH% | 5.76 | 3.51 | 6.72 | -48% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.17 | 0.20 | -14% |
| iCF/60 | – | 7.58 | 8.68 | -13% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 2.33 | 2.76 | -16% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 0.48 | 0.64 | -25% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 8.16 | 8.11 | 8.27 | -2% |
| IPP | 36.88 | 36.82 | 37.04 | -1% |
| 1A/60 | 0.34 | 0.37 | 0.28 | +34% |
| 2A/60 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.29 | -11% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.07 | -39% |
| PP iSH% | – | n/a | 0.00 | |
| PP SOG/60 | 1.80 | 0.00 | 7.20 | -100% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.00 | 0.69 | -100% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 3.09 | 3.71 | 2.76 | +34% |
| Hits/60 | 3.97 | 4.34 | 5.11 | -15% |
| Blks/60 | 5.03 | 4.71 | 5.41 | -13% |