🏒@HockeyBangers2026-27 projections

Overview

@HockeyBangers

2026-27 Projection

Jake Middleton

CGY · Age 30.6 · 🇨🇦 Canada · 6′3″, 219 lb · Draft 2014, 210th overall (L.A)
CGYteam
Dposition
126position rank
377skater rank
-2overall
-51offense
49peripherals

Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.

Per 82 GP2026-27projection2025-2675 GPH239 GPH136 GPPrev 3226 GP · 3y
TOI17.8417.5116.5417.7920.15
PP TOI0.040.040.040.060.07
G52227
A1415131816
PTS1917152022
PPP00000
SOG7668686795
PIM61836510269
Hits869575117131
Blocks140128127129164

Sample: 75 GP · 1,132 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates

Positional rankingDefense · league-wide (of 303)
offenseperipheralsvalue over replacement

Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.

Metrics worth highlighting

The charts that move this projection — where he broke from his own 3-year rate, where the season split in half, and where we’re taking the number next year
Below his 3-year rate
iSH%
3.5122-2323-2424-2525-26

iSH% ran 48% below his 3-year rate last season (3.51 against 6.72).

Second-half fade
HITS
8622-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5

Hits ran at a 75 pace in the second half after 117 in the first, per 82 games.

Second-half fade
A
1422-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5

Assists ran at a 13 pace in the second half after 18 in the first, per 82 games.

Picked automatically from every chart on this card, ranked by how far each number moved. Each claim is measured off the chart drawn beside it.

Similar & complementary players

Similar makeup Defense
Closest across all seven categories — match % is the whole-profile fit
  • Connor MurphyD · Edmonton Oilers94% match
    shared: PIM, Blocks, Hits
  • Ben ChiarotD · Detroit Red Wings89% match
    shared: PIM, Blocks, Hits
  • Kaiden GuhleD · Montreal Canadiens88% match
    shared: PIM, Blocks, Hits
  • Simon EdvinssonD · Detroit Red Wings87% match
    shared: PIM, Blocks, Hits
Complementary Defense
Same position, opposite profile — strong where Jake Middleton is weak or average, light where he’s strong
  • Cale MakarD · Colorado Avalanchecovers 3
    fills: A, PPP, SOG
  • Zach WerenskiD · Columbus Blue Jacketscovers 3
    fills: SOG, A, PPP
  • Quinn HughesD · Minnesota Wildcovers 3
    fills: A, PPP, SOG
  • Evan BouchardD · Edmonton Oilerscovers 3
    fills: A, PPP, SOG
Profile shape — per-82 category values vs the league p99 for the position (same scale as the hero bars)
This player
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
the profile below
vs Similar
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
similar players hug the shape
vs Complementary
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
complements fill the gaps

Deployment

Deployment projection — next-year TOI & PP TOI vs the last two years (the role that drives every count)
Coaching
2026-27 · Ryan Huska (CGY)
Last year (MIN, traded): John Hynes full season — no change
Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
TOI17.8417.5120.15-13%
5v5 TOI14.8315.1017.32-13%
PP TOI0.040.040.07-39%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  19 · 17 · 21 · 18
TOI*
3-yr 20.1515.61Q1Q2Q3Q4
5v5 TOI
3-yr 17.3213.60Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP TOI
3-yr 0.070.02Q1Q2Q3Q4
*Total TOI by quarter reconstructs 5v5+PP quarterly totals plus a held-flat season PK/GP — NST has no all-strength quarterly export. Level is accurate; quarter-to-quarter movement comes from 5v5+PP.
By season — year over year
TOI
17.8422-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
5v5 TOI
14.8322-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
PP TOI
0.0422-2323-2424-2525-2626-27

Shooting — volume & conversion

How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
SOG/603.133.133.66-15%
G/600.150.110.25-55%
iSH%5.763.516.72-48%
ixG/600.170.20-14%
iCF/607.588.68-13%
iSCF/602.332.76-16%
iHDCF/600.480.64-25%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  19 · 17 · 21 · 18
SOG/60
3-yr 3.663.92Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSH%
3-yr 6.726.38Q1Q2Q3Q4
ixG/60
3-yr 0.200.16Q1Q2Q3Q4
iCF/60
3-yr 8.689.81Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSCF/60
3-yr 2.763.68Q1Q2Q3Q4
iHDCF/60
3-yr 0.640.49Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
SOG/60
3.1322-2323-2424-2525-26
iSH%
3.5122-2323-2424-2525-26
ixG/60
0.1722-2323-2424-2525-26
iCF/60
7.5822-2323-2424-2525-26
iSCF/60
2.3322-2323-2424-2525-26
iHDCF/60
0.4822-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
G
522-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
SOG
7622-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextFinishing looks earned: iSH% 3.5% sits near the 6.7% 3-yr mark with 5v5 ixG/60 0.17 (18th pct league-wide) — goals held close to last year.
RiskShot volume down 15% (5v5 SOG/60 3.13 vs 3.66) — volume is the repeatable half, so this caps the goal ceiling.
ContextTrajectory: 5v5 ixG/60 fell from 0.20 (1st half) to 0.15 (2nd) even though shot volume held — a chance-quality dip, not a volume one.

Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense

Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
on-ice SH%8.168.118.27-2%
IPP36.8836.8237.04-1%
1A/600.340.370.28+34%
2A/600.260.260.29-11%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  19 · 17 · 21 · 18
1A/60
3-yr 0.280.25Q1Q2Q3Q4
2A/60
3-yr 0.290.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
1A/60
0.3722-2323-2424-2525-26
2A/60
0.2622-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
A
1422-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
PTS
1922-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextAssist environment looks normal (on-ice SH% 8.1%, IPP 36.8%).
ContextDefenseman — weight transition/PP facilitation over raw 2A; secondary assists read a touch better for D than forwards.

Power play

PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.

Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PP TOI0.040.040.07-39%
PP iSH%n/a0.00
PP SOG/601.800.007.20-100%
PP ixG/600.000.69-100%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  19 · 17 · 21 · 18
PP TOI/GP
3-yr 0.070.02Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP SOG/60
3-yr 7.200.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP ixG/60
3-yr 0.690.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PP TOI/GP
0.0422-2323-2424-2525-26
PP SOG/60
0.0022-2323-2424-2525-26
PP ixG/60
0.0022-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PPP
022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPG
022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPA
022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. PPG and PPA are the 2 halves of the PPP above them, split by the projection's own goal/assist mix. PP-only, so the halves are exact.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
RiskPP role projected down: 0.0→0.0 PP TOI/gp (role tapered late (Q4 0.0 vs 0.0 full-year) — projected toward the softer finish) — the biggest PPP lever.

Physical — PIM · hits · blocks

Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PIMs/603.093.712.76+34%
Hits/603.974.345.11-15%
Blks/605.034.715.41-13%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  19 · 17 · 21 · 18
PIMs/60
3-yr 2.762.45Q1Q2Q3Q4
Hits/60
3-yr 5.112.21Q1Q2Q3Q4
Blks/60
3-yr 5.415.88Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PIMs/60
3.7122-2323-2424-2525-26
Hits/60
4.3422-2323-2424-2525-26
Blks/60
4.7122-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PIM
6122-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
HITS
8622-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
BLK
14022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
RiskHits tailing off: Q4 2.21/60 and 2nd-half 3.34 below the 4.34 season rate — projected DOWN to 3.97/60, weighting the recent decline over the 5.11 3-yr mark.
TailwindBlocks surging late: Q4 5.88/60 and 2nd-half 5.00 vs a 4.71 season rate (5.41 3-yr) (90th pct league-wide) — reads as a real role/confidence step, so projected UP to 5.03/60, weighting the finish over the 3-yr baseline.
TailwindFights / takes majors (0.32/60) — a real PIM source, valuable in banger and PIM formats.