Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2682 GP | H240 GP | H142 GP | Prev 3179 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 20.92 | 20.89 | 20.56 | 19.53 | 21.03 |
| PP TOI | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.16 | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| G | 3 | 4 | 1 | 7 | 3 |
| A | 20 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 23 |
| PTS | 23 | 16 | 19 | 13 | 27 |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SOG | 126 | 122 | 120 | 124 | 127 |
| PIM | 53 | 50 | 63 | 37 | 44 |
| Hits | 74 | 66 | 80 | 53 | 98 |
| Blocks | 113 | 125 | 109 | 140 | 136 |
Sample: 82 GP · 1,424 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
We’re projecting assists 67% above last season, 12 to 20.
Penalty minutes ran at a 63 pace in the second half after 37 in the first, per 82 games.
Hits ran at a 80 pace in the second half after 53 in the first, per 82 games.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 20.92 | 20.89 | 21.03 | -1% |
| 5v5 TOI | 17.64 | 17.37 | 17.73 | -2% |
| PP TOI | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.13 | +17% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 4.69 | 4.84 | 4.82 | +0% |
| G/60 | 0.11 | 0.13 | 0.09 | +38% |
| iSH% | 2.32 | 2.69 | 1.95 | +38% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.25 | 0.23 | +11% |
| iCF/60 | – | 12.85 | 12.50 | +3% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 3.03 | 3.23 | -6% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 0.42 | 0.55 | -23% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 7.51 | 7.10 | 8.01 | -11% |
| IPP | 31.07 | 27.78 | 36.45 | -24% |
| 1A/60 | 0.27 | 0.25 | 0.34 | -27% |
| 2A/60 | 0.41 | 0.17 | 0.43 | -61% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.13 | +17% |
| PP iSH% | – | n/a | 0.00 | |
| PP SOG/60 | 0.34 | 0.00 | 2.61 | -100% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.00 | 0.05 | -100% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 2.26 | 2.02 | 1.69 | +20% |
| Hits/60 | 2.91 | 2.61 | 3.67 | -29% |
| Blks/60 | 3.57 | 4.13 | 3.97 | +4% |