Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection adj | 2025-2676 GP | H236 GP | H140 GP | Prev 388 GP · 2y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 18.00 | 16.98 | 14.70 | 17.66 | 19.05 |
| PP TOI | 1.60 | 0.76 | 0.11 | 1.35 | 2.22 |
| G | 8 | 8 | 6 | 9 | 8 |
| A | ▲24 | 16 | 13 | 20 | 19 |
| PTS | ▲32 | 24 | 18 | 29 | 27 |
| PPP | ▲9 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 7 |
| SOG | 135 | 128 | 120 | 136 | 153 |
| PIM | 27 | 37 | 25 | 48 | 22 |
| Hits | 37 | 35 | 23 | 46 | 48 |
| Blocks | 97 | 92 | 88 | 95 | 103 |
Sample: 76 GP · 1,109 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Context-adjusted (▲/▼ vs the rate-model baseline): TOI set to 18.0. Blocks and shots were each ~12-20 short of the outside read; rather than patch both counts, the minutes assumption behind them was corrected and the rates left alone. Stop negatively regressing a 22yo D: TOI ~18.5, PPTOI ~1.6, ~30 pts / ~9 PPP. Shares a 2-D PP2 with Power (both trimmed from 2.0 — two D can't each own the PP2 minutes).
Metrics worth highlighting
PP TOI ran 66% below his 3-year rate last season (0.76 against 2.22).
We’re projecting assists 50% above last season, 16 to 24.
iSH% finished the year 63% below where it started (7.88 in the first half, 2.88 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
1A/60 finished the year 62% below where it started (0.48 in the first half, 0.18 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 18.00 | 16.98 | 19.05 | -11% |
| 5v5 TOI | 13.50 | 14.60 | 15.85 | -8% |
| PP TOI | 1.60 | 0.76 | 2.22 | -66% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 5.74 | 5.57 | 5.25 | +6% |
| G/60 | 0.28 | 0.27 | 0.26 | +4% |
| iSH% | 4.89 | 4.85 | 4.94 | -2% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.40 | 0.27 | +48% |
| iCF/60 | – | 14.44 | 13.12 | +10% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 4.60 | 3.53 | +30% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 1.08 | 0.52 | +109% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.63 | 9.99 | 8.00 | +25% |
| IPP | 30.92 | 30.36 | 34.50 | -12% |
| 1A/60 | 0.35 | 0.38 | 0.30 | +26% |
| 2A/60 | 0.23 | 0.27 | 0.22 | +24% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 1.60 | 0.76 | 2.22 | -66% |
| PP iSH% | 6.44 | 16.64 | 3.21 | +418% |
| PP SOG/60 | 2.85 | 6.19 | 9.52 | -35% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.40 | 0.75 | -47% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.09 | 1.51 | 0.86 | +76% |
| Hits/60 | 1.39 | 1.41 | 2.06 | -32% |
| Blks/60 | 4.09 | 4.06 | 4.13 | -2% |