Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2667 GP | H232 GP | H135 GP | Prev 3201 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 11.68 | 11.43 | 10.73 | 11.80 | 12.65 |
| PP TOI | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.03 | 0.07 | 0.03 |
| G | 12 | 15 | 6 | 22 | 12 |
| A | 11 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 15 |
| PTS | 23 | 22 | 13 | 30 | 27 |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SOG | 101 | 103 | 92 | 113 | 110 |
| PIM | 14 | 10 | 15 | 5 | 14 |
| Hits | 118 | 110 | 105 | 115 | 139 |
| Blocks | 17 | 16 | 19 | 13 | 23 |
Sample: 67 GP · 682 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Goals ran at a 6 pace in the second half after 22 in the first, per 82 games.
iSH% finished the year 73% below where it started (21.30 in the first half, 5.86 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
1A/60 ran 42% below his 3-year rate last season (0.35 against 0.61).
Blks/60 sits in the 4th percentile league-wide (1.05).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 11.68 | 11.43 | 12.65 | -10% |
| 5v5 TOI | 10.22 | 10.19 | 11.27 | -10% |
| PP TOI | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.03 | +82% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 6.77 | 6.77 | 6.70 | +1% |
| G/60 | 0.86 | 0.97 | 0.66 | +46% |
| iSH% | 12.65 | 14.33 | 9.91 | +45% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.96 | 0.88 | +9% |
| iCF/60 | – | 15.02 | 13.37 | +12% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 9.49 | 8.39 | +13% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 5.10 | 4.66 | +9% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 8.12 | 8.05 | 8.23 | -2% |
| IPP | 62.60 | 59.49 | 68.06 | -13% |
| 1A/60 | 0.51 | 0.35 | 0.61 | -42% |
| 2A/60 | 0.22 | 0.09 | 0.32 | -72% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.03 | +82% |
| PP iSH% | 0.00 | 0.00 | n/a | |
| PP SOG/60 | 19.70 | 18.56 | 0.00 | |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 4.40 | 0.00 |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 0.94 | 0.70 | 0.87 | -20% |
| Hits/60 | 8.20 | 7.73 | 8.90 | -13% |
| Blks/60 | 1.10 | 1.05 | 1.14 | -8% |