Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2670 GP | H233 GP | H137 GP | Prev 3160 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 11.83 | 11.89 | 12.03 | 11.59 | 12.45 |
| PP TOI | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.09 |
| G | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 |
| A | 12 | 13 | 14 | 12 | 12 |
| PTS | 18 | 18 | 19 | 17 | 20 |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| SOG | 78 | 72 | 78 | 66 | 105 |
| PIM | 39 | 47 | 64 | 31 | 16 |
| Hits | 112 | 131 | 143 | 121 | 91 |
| Blocks | 37 | 43 | 51 | 37 | 30 |
Sample: 70 GP · 680 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Penalty minutes ran at a 64 pace in the second half after 31 in the first, per 82 games.
ixG/60 finished the year 48% above where it started (0.47 in the first half, 0.70 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
Hits/60 ran 55% above his 3-year rate last season (9.61 against 6.20).
PP TOI sits in the 3th percentile league-wide (0.01).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 11.83 | 11.89 | 12.45 | -4% |
| 5v5 TOI | 9.87 | 9.72 | 10.46 | -7% |
| PP TOI | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.09 | -91% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 4.79 | 4.94 | 6.24 | -21% |
| G/60 | 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.39 | -11% |
| iSH% | 6.79 | 7.09 | 6.31 | +12% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.58 | 0.59 | -2% |
| iCF/60 | – | 11.90 | 12.45 | -4% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 5.64 | 5.70 | -1% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 2.73 | 2.54 | +7% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 8.42 | 9.74 | 6.89 | +41% |
| IPP | 63.86 | 63.40 | 64.72 | -2% |
| 1A/60 | 0.57 | 0.62 | 0.54 | +16% |
| 2A/60 | 0.27 | 0.26 | 0.18 | +46% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.09 | -91% |
| PP iSH% | – | n/a | 49.98 | |
| PP SOG/60 | 2.08 | 0.00 | 8.30 | -100% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.00 | 0.84 | -100% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 3.30 | 3.17 | 0.86 | +267% |
| Hits/60 | 8.12 | 9.61 | 6.20 | +55% |
| Blks/60 | 2.46 | 2.64 | 1.76 | +50% |