Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2678 GP | H239 GP | H139 GP | Prev 3194 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 19.96 | 20.33 | 20.81 | 18.60 | 17.41 |
| PP TOI | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.09 | 0.07 | 0.05 |
| G | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| A | 14 | 16 | 21 | 11 | 12 |
| PTS | 18 | 18 | 23 | 13 | 17 |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SOG | 83 | 71 | 80 | 61 | 79 |
| PIM | 39 | 32 | 25 | 38 | 46 |
| Hits | 147 | 130 | 134 | 127 | 142 |
| Blocks | 155 | 147 | 172 | 122 | 124 |
Sample: 78 GP · 1,355 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Assists ran at a 21 pace in the second half after 11 in the first, per 82 games.
Blocks ran at a 172 pace in the second half after 122 in the first, per 82 games.
iSH% ran 45% below his 3-year rate last season (3.27 against 5.94).
SOG/60 ran 25% below his 3-year rate last season (2.75 against 3.64).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 19.96 | 20.33 | 17.41 | +17% |
| 5v5 TOI | 17.84 | 17.37 | 15.78 | +10% |
| PP TOI | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.05 | +75% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 2.75 | 2.75 | 3.64 | -25% |
| G/60 | 0.12 | 0.09 | 0.22 | -58% |
| iSH% | 5.14 | 3.27 | 5.94 | -45% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.12 | 0.17 | -30% |
| iCF/60 | – | 7.97 | 9.23 | -14% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 2.13 | 2.67 | -20% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 0.27 | 0.37 | -27% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 8.38 | 8.45 | 8.29 | +2% |
| IPP | 31.26 | 30.41 | 32.29 | -6% |
| 1A/60 | 0.23 | 0.22 | 0.26 | -14% |
| 2A/60 | 0.29 | 0.35 | 0.27 | +27% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.05 | +75% |
| PP iSH% | 0.00 | 0.00 | n/a | |
| PP SOG/60 | 12.14 | 9.47 | 0.00 | |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.21 | 0.63 | -67% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.48 | 1.33 | 2.08 | -36% |
| Hits/60 | 5.50 | 5.00 | 6.25 | -20% |
| Blks/60 | 5.25 | 4.96 | 4.84 | +2% |