Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2638 GP | H23 GP | H135 GP | Prev 3237 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 11.80 | 11.75 | – | 11.54 | 13.36 |
| PP TOI | 1.64 | 1.61 | – | 1.51 | 2.18 |
| G | 13 | 6 | – | 7 | 17 |
| A | 17 | 9 | – | 9 | 23 |
| PTS | 30 | 15 | – | 16 | 39 |
| PPP | 10 | 6 | – | 7 | 14 |
| SOG | 119 | 112 | – | 115 | 142 |
| PIM | 39 | 71 | – | 77 | 38 |
| Hits | 97 | 71 | – | 73 | 127 |
| Blocks | 23 | 32 | – | 32 | 23 |
Sample: 38 GP · 374 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
We’re projecting power play points 67% above last season, 6 to 10.
PIMs/60 ran 150% above his 3-year rate last season (5.28 against 2.11).
1A/60 ran 55% below his 3-year rate last season (0.32 against 0.71).
We’re projecting hits 37% above last season, 71 to 97.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 11.80 | 11.75 | 13.36 | -12% |
| 5v5 TOI | 9.86 | 9.86 | 10.69 | -8% |
| PP TOI | 1.64 | 1.61 | 2.18 | -26% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 5.91 | 6.09 | 6.72 | -9% |
| G/60 | 0.42 | 0.32 | 0.57 | -44% |
| iSH% | 7.10 | 5.25 | 8.44 | -38% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.73 | 0.94 | -22% |
| iCF/60 | – | 10.41 | 12.19 | -15% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 4.48 | 7.05 | -36% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 2.56 | 4.31 | -41% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 5.37 | 3.51 | 8.40 | -58% |
| IPP | 64.90 | 66.67 | 62.73 | +6% |
| 1A/60 | 0.49 | 0.32 | 0.71 | -55% |
| 2A/60 | 0.19 | 0.00 | 0.35 | -100% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 1.64 | 1.61 | 2.18 | -26% |
| PP iSH% | 16.34 | 7.15 | 18.93 | -62% |
| PP SOG/60 | 13.50 | 13.70 | 12.89 | +6% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 3.26 | 3.64 | -10% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 3.77 | 5.28 | 2.11 | +151% |
| Hits/60 | 6.14 | 5.28 | 8.10 | -35% |
| Blks/60 | 1.82 | 2.08 | 1.47 | +42% |