🏒@HockeyBangers2026-27 projections

Overview

@HockeyBangers

2026-27 Projection

Sam Dickinson

SJS · Age 20
SJSteam
Dposition
226position rank
642skater rank
-35overall
-54offense
19peripherals

Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.

Per 82 GP2026-27projection2025-2672 GPH240 GPH132 GPPrev 3thin
TOI17.9316.7616.9915.28
PP TOI0.360.310.300.32
G11-02
A1715209
PTS18162011
PPP0000
SOG96828578
PIM26252920
Hits92849768
Blocks85798867

Sample: 72 GP · 1,080 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates

Positional rankingDefense · league-wide (of 303)
offenseperipheralsvalue over replacement

Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.

Metrics worth highlighting

The charts that move this projection — where he broke from his own 3-year rate, where the season split in half, and where we’re taking the number next year
Second-half surge
HITS
9222-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5

Hits ran at a 97 pace in the second half after 68 in the first, per 82 games.

Second-half surge
PIMs/60
0.69Q1Q2Q3Q4

PIMs/60 finished the year 72% above where it started (0.82 in the first half, 1.41 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.

We project it up
A
1722-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5

We’re projecting assists 13% above last season, 15 to 17.

Picked automatically from every chart on this card, ranked by how far each number moved. Each claim is measured off the chart drawn beside it.

Similar & complementary players

Similar makeup Defense
Closest across all seven categories — match % is the whole-profile fit
Complementary Defense
Same position, opposite profile — strong where Sam Dickinson is weak or average, light where he’s strong
Profile shape — per-82 category values vs the league p99 for the position (same scale as the hero bars)
This player
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
the profile below
vs Similar
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
similar players hug the shape
vs Complementary
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
complements fill the gaps

Deployment

Deployment projection — next-year TOI & PP TOI vs the last two years (the role that drives every count)
Coaching
2026-27 · Ryan Warsofsky (SJS)
Last year: Ryan Warsofsky full season — no change
Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
TOI17.9316.76n/a
5v5 TOI16.8215.00n/a
PP TOI0.360.31n/a
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  16 · 16 · 19 · 21
TOI*
17.96Q1Q2Q3Q4
5v5 TOI
16.61Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP TOI
0.43Q1Q2Q3Q4
*Total TOI by quarter reconstructs 5v5+PP quarterly totals plus a held-flat season PK/GP — NST has no all-strength quarterly export. Level is accurate; quarter-to-quarter movement comes from 5v5+PP.
By season — year over year
TOI
17.9322-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
5v5 TOI
16.8222-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
PP TOI
0.3622-2323-2424-2525-2626-27

Shooting — volume & conversion

How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
SOG/603.893.78n/a
G/600.060.06n/a
iSH%1.591.59n/a
ixG/600.22n/a
iCF/6010.67n/a
iSCF/602.78n/a
iHDCF/600.61n/a
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  16 · 16 · 19 · 21
SOG/60
2.92Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSH%
0.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
ixG/60
0.28Q1Q2Q3Q4
iCF/60
11.87Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSCF/60
3.96Q1Q2Q3Q4
iHDCF/60
1.03Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
SOG/60
3.7822-2323-2424-2525-26
iSH%
1.5922-2323-2424-2525-26
ixG/60
0.2222-2323-2424-2525-26
iCF/60
10.6722-2323-2424-2525-26
iSCF/60
2.7822-2323-2424-2525-26
iHDCF/60
0.6122-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
G
122-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
SOG
9622-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
TailwindAge 20 — still on the up-slope of the scoring curve.
TailwindAge 20 on a single NHL season — projected a development step, not a flat repeat: scoring rates +10% and role +7% toward the mid-20s peak (a young riser improves on last year, not repeats it).

Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense

Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
on-ice SH%11.0211.02n/a
IPP21.9421.94n/a
1A/600.220.22n/a
2A/600.330.33n/a
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  16 · 16 · 19 · 21
1A/60
0.34Q1Q2Q3Q4
2A/60
0.34Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
1A/60
0.2222-2323-2424-2525-26
2A/60
0.3322-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
A
1722-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
PTS
1822-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextAssist environment looks normal (on-ice SH% 11.0%, IPP 21.9%).
ContextDefenseman — weight transition/PP facilitation over raw 2A; secondary assists read a touch better for D than forwards.

Power play

PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.

Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PP TOI0.360.31n/a
PP iSH%0.000.00n/a
PP SOG/602.822.70n/a
PP ixG/600.53n/a
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  16 · 16 · 19 · 21
PP TOI/GP
0.43Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP SOG/60
6.65Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP ixG/60
0.22Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PP TOI/GP
0.3122-2323-2424-2525-26
PP SOG/60
2.7022-2323-2424-2525-26
PP ixG/60
0.5322-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PPP
022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPG
022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPA
022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. PPG and PPA are the 2 halves of the PPP above them, split by the projection's own goal/assist mix. PP-only, so the halves are exact.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
TailwindPP role projected up: 0.3→0.4 PP TOI/gp (same coach (Ryan Warsofsky) — carries the elevated finish (2nd half 0.3, Q4 0.4) over the full-year 0.3; one NHL season — role grown +7% toward a sophomore workload) — the biggest PPP lever.

Physical — PIM · hits · blocks

Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PIMs/601.111.11n/a
Hits/603.843.78n/a
Blks/603.563.56n/a
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  16 · 16 · 19 · 21
PIMs/60
0.69Q1Q2Q3Q4
Hits/60
4.13Q1Q2Q3Q4
Blks/60
3.44Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PIMs/60
1.1122-2323-2424-2525-26
Hits/60
3.7822-2323-2424-2525-26
Blks/60
3.5622-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PIM
2622-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
HITS
9222-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
BLK
8522-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
TailwindHits surging late: Q4 4.13/60 and 2nd-half 4.20 vs a 3.78 season rate (n/a 3-yr) (47th pct league-wide) — reads as a real role/confidence step, so projected UP to 3.84/60, weighting the finish over the 3-yr baseline.
ContextBlocks role-stable at 3.56/60 (72nd pct league-wide) → 3.56 projected.