Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2683 GP | H243 GP | H140 GP | Prev 3246 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 18.73 | 18.96 | 18.87 | 17.78 | 17.81 |
| PP TOI | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.22 | 0.04 | 0.13 |
| G | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| A | 15 | 11 | 14 | 7 | 16 |
| PTS | 19 | 12 | 16 | 7 | 20 |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SOG | 106 | 94 | 107 | 80 | 114 |
| PIM | 31 | 38 | 44 | 31 | 29 |
| Hits | 26 | 19 | 23 | 14 | 70 |
| Blocks | 104 | 107 | 103 | 111 | 98 |
Sample: 83 GP · 1,399 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Hits/60 ran 75% below his 3-year rate last season (0.73 against 2.98).
We’re projecting assists 36% above last season, 11 to 15.
Penalty minutes ran at a 44 pace in the second half after 31 in the first, per 82 games.
SOG/60 finished the year 32% above where it started (3.31 in the first half, 4.37 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 18.73 | 18.96 | 17.81 | +6% |
| 5v5 TOI | 16.88 | 16.86 | 15.81 | +7% |
| PP TOI | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | -1% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 3.86 | 3.90 | 5.06 | -23% |
| G/60 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.18 | -78% |
| iSH% | 2.81 | 1.03 | 3.57 | -71% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.15 | 0.18 | -15% |
| iCF/60 | – | 9.22 | 10.68 | -14% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 1.93 | 2.63 | -27% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 0.34 | 0.43 | -21% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 7.73 | 7.63 | 7.98 | -4% |
| IPP | 27.05 | 24.87 | 33.70 | -26% |
| 1A/60 | 0.19 | 0.21 | 0.16 | +35% |
| 2A/60 | 0.37 | 0.21 | 0.46 | -55% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.13 | -1% |
| PP iSH% | – | n/a | 0.00 | |
| PP SOG/60 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 3.67 | -100% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.00 | 0.18 | -100% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.39 | 1.54 | 1.34 | +15% |
| Hits/60 | 0.99 | 0.73 | 2.98 | -75% |
| Blks/60 | 3.69 | 3.82 | 3.69 | +4% |