Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2680 GP | H239 GP | H141 GP | Prev 3197 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 12.79 | 12.82 | 12.26 | 12.73 | 14.88 |
| PP TOI | 0.62 | 0.77 | 0.52 | 1.00 | 1.20 |
| G | 8 | 5 | 6 | 4 | 14 |
| A | 13 | 10 | 8 | 12 | 20 |
| PTS | 21 | 15 | 15 | 16 | 34 |
| PPP | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| SOG | 81 | 85 | 74 | 96 | 118 |
| PIM | 13 | 14 | 13 | 16 | 23 |
| Hits | 118 | 136 | 144 | 129 | 119 |
| Blocks | 59 | 69 | 69 | 68 | 60 |
Sample: 80 GP · 921 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
PP TOI finished the year 53% below where it started (1.00 in the first half, 0.47 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
iSH% ran 53% below his 3-year rate last season (5.39 against 11.52).
1A/60 ran 48% below his 3-year rate last season (0.26 against 0.50).
We’re projecting assists 30% above last season, 10 to 13.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 12.79 | 12.82 | 14.88 | -14% |
| 5v5 TOI | 11.28 | 11.52 | 12.85 | -10% |
| PP TOI | 0.62 | 0.77 | 1.20 | -36% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 4.58 | 4.82 | 5.78 | -17% |
| G/60 | 0.33 | 0.26 | 0.67 | -61% |
| iSH% | 8.95 | 5.39 | 11.52 | -53% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.60 | 0.68 | -12% |
| iCF/60 | – | 9.76 | 11.26 | -13% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 6.57 | 7.09 | -7% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 3.25 | 3.24 | +0% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 8.64 | 8.64 | 8.63 | +0% |
| IPP | 41.38 | 30.77 | 58.74 | -48% |
| 1A/60 | 0.32 | 0.26 | 0.50 | -48% |
| 2A/60 | 0.31 | 0.20 | 0.36 | -44% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.62 | 0.77 | 1.20 | -36% |
| PP iSH% | 13.75 | 14.31 | 13.35 | +7% |
| PP SOG/60 | 5.55 | 6.85 | 7.63 | -10% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 1.83 | 1.31 | +39% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 0.71 | 0.78 | 1.21 | -36% |
| Hits/60 | 7.33 | 8.27 | 6.37 | +30% |
| Blks/60 | 3.82 | 4.23 | 3.20 | +32% |