Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2661 GP | H236 GP | H125 GP | Prev 3220 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 11.12 | 10.94 | 10.55 | 11.17 | 15.47 |
| PP TOI | 0.11 | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.98 |
| G | 10 | 8 | 4 | 14 | 18 |
| A | 9 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 17 |
| PTS | 19 | 12 | 8 | 18 | 35 |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| SOG | 104 | 103 | 87 | 127 | 159 |
| PIM | 33 | 44 | 46 | 42 | 41 |
| Hits | 119 | 145 | 128 | 171 | 145 |
| Blocks | 38 | 44 | 38 | 54 | 43 |
Sample: 61 GP · 610 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Goals ran at a 4 pace in the second half after 14 in the first, per 82 games.
iSH% finished the year 68% below where it started (7.12 in the first half, 2.25 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
1A/60 ran 60% below his 3-year rate last season (0.20 against 0.50).
PIMs/60 ran 77% above his 3-year rate last season (3.05 against 1.72).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 11.12 | 10.94 | 15.47 | -29% |
| 5v5 TOI | 9.99 | 10.01 | 12.50 | -20% |
| PP TOI | 0.11 | 0.07 | 0.98 | -92% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 6.35 | 6.68 | 7.63 | -12% |
| G/60 | 0.60 | 0.49 | 0.83 | -41% |
| iSH% | 9.37 | 7.34 | 10.84 | -32% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.69 | 0.80 | -13% |
| iCF/60 | – | 12.28 | 13.74 | -11% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 6.88 | 7.68 | -10% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 3.14 | 3.49 | -10% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 7.93 | 6.98 | 9.49 | -27% |
| IPP | 54.48 | 50.32 | 61.27 | -18% |
| 1A/60 | 0.36 | 0.20 | 0.50 | -60% |
| 2A/60 | 0.23 | 0.10 | 0.33 | -70% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.11 | 0.07 | 0.98 | -92% |
| PP iSH% | – | n/a | 11.15 | |
| PP SOG/60 | 2.51 | 0.00 | 10.03 | -100% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 1.15 | 2.14 | -46% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 2.38 | 3.05 | 1.72 | +77% |
| Hits/60 | 8.99 | 10.61 | 7.90 | +34% |
| Blks/60 | 2.45 | 2.65 | 2.14 | +24% |