Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2678 GP | H239 GP | H139 GP | Prev 3125 GP · 2y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 12.62 | 12.66 | 12.37 | 12.45 | 11.72 |
| PP TOI | 1.15 | 1.10 | 1.13 | 1.07 | 0.93 |
| G | 18 | 17 | 15 | 19 | 19 |
| A | 14 | 17 | 12 | 22 | 13 |
| PTS | 32 | 34 | 26 | 41 | 32 |
| PPP | 3 | 4 | 2 | 6 | 3 |
| SOG | 136 | 134 | 123 | 144 | 136 |
| PIM | 15 | 11 | 21 | -0 | 13 |
| Hits | 70 | 79 | 69 | 88 | 74 |
| Blocks | 38 | 38 | 34 | 42 | 37 |
Sample: 78 GP · 874 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Power play points ran at a 2 pace in the second half after 6 in the first, per 82 games.
Assists ran at a 12 pace in the second half after 22 in the first, per 82 games.
iHDCF/60 ran 57% above his 3-year rate last season (3.84 against 2.44).
PP TOI ran 19% above his 3-year rate last season (1.10 against 0.93).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 12.62 | 12.66 | 11.72 | +8% |
| 5v5 TOI | 11.18 | 11.21 | 10.61 | +6% |
| PP TOI | 1.15 | 1.10 | 0.93 | +19% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 7.82 | 7.82 | 8.59 | -9% |
| G/60 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 1.17 | -18% |
| iSH% | 12.80 | 12.28 | 13.66 | -10% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.86 | 0.67 | +28% |
| iCF/60 | – | 13.52 | 15.92 | -15% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 8.30 | 7.19 | +15% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 3.84 | 2.44 | +57% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.81 | 10.23 | 8.80 | +16% |
| IPP | 72.50 | 72.83 | 71.33 | +2% |
| 1A/60 | 0.45 | 0.48 | 0.45 | +6% |
| 2A/60 | 0.29 | 0.41 | 0.27 | +52% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 1.15 | 1.10 | 0.93 | +19% |
| PP iSH% | 18.30 | 16.63 | 18.77 | -11% |
| PP SOG/60 | 6.82 | 8.36 | 8.29 | +1% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 1.28 | 1.62 | -21% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 0.93 | 0.69 | 0.90 | -24% |
| Hits/60 | 4.42 | 5.01 | 4.88 | +3% |
| Blks/60 | 2.40 | 2.47 | 2.53 | -2% |