Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2667 GP | H227 GP | H140 GP | Prev 3190 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 14.02 | 14.06 | 13.42 | 13.94 | 14.88 |
| PP TOI | 0.61 | 0.70 | 0.19 | 1.05 | 0.66 |
| G | 14 | 16 | 18 | 14 | 15 |
| A | 15 | 15 | 16 | 13 | 14 |
| PTS | 29 | 31 | 35 | 28 | 29 |
| PPP | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| SOG | 117 | 111 | 133 | 97 | 135 |
| PIM | 31 | 37 | 24 | 45 | 31 |
| Hits | 87 | 91 | 107 | 79 | 75 |
| Blocks | 42 | 49 | 47 | 50 | 43 |
Sample: 67 GP · 779 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
SOG/60 finished the year 67% above where it started (4.14 in the first half, 6.91 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
ixG/60 finished the year 51% above where it started (0.42 in the first half, 0.62 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
1A/60 ran 54% above his 3-year rate last season (0.69 against 0.45).
Blks/60 ran 33% above his 3-year rate last season (2.77 against 2.08).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 14.02 | 14.06 | 14.88 | -6% |
| 5v5 TOI | 11.47 | 11.64 | 11.22 | +4% |
| PP TOI | 0.61 | 0.70 | 0.66 | +6% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 5.70 | 5.31 | 7.18 | -26% |
| G/60 | 0.55 | 0.54 | 0.67 | -20% |
| iSH% | 9.70 | 10.17 | 9.36 | +9% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.50 | 0.68 | -27% |
| iCF/60 | – | 11.85 | 13.82 | -14% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 5.16 | 7.57 | -32% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 1.92 | 3.04 | -37% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 7.42 | 7.22 | 8.04 | -10% |
| IPP | 73.59 | 75.14 | 68.90 | +9% |
| 1A/60 | 0.63 | 0.69 | 0.45 | +54% |
| 2A/60 | 0.22 | 0.15 | 0.25 | -40% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.61 | 0.70 | 0.66 | +6% |
| PP iSH% | 4.19 | 9.98 | 0.00 | |
| PP SOG/60 | 11.22 | 12.73 | 6.68 | +91% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 2.43 | 1.19 | +105% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.76 | 1.85 | 1.86 | -0% |
| Hits/60 | 4.97 | 5.08 | 4.36 | +16% |
| Blks/60 | 2.50 | 2.77 | 2.08 | +33% |