Per 82 GP	2026-27projection	2025-2678 GP	H241 GP	H137 GP	Prev 3239 GP · 3y
TOI	17.55	16.93	17.21	16.18	19.22
PP TOI	0.04	0.03	0.02	0.04	0.06
G	5	5	4	7	5
A	11	10	8	13	14
PTS	16	16	12	20	19
PPP	0	0	0	0	0
SOG	81	81	72	91	86
PIM	48	38	52	22	46
Hits	108	118	129	106	106
Blocks	117	112	94	131	150

Sample: 78 GP · 1,172 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates

Positional rankingDefense · league-wide (of 303)

161Derek Forbort-13

162Philip Broberg-14

163Mike Reilly-14

164Jamie Oleksiak-14

165Uvis Balinskis-15

166Conor Timmins-15

167Johnathan Kovacevic-16

offenseperipheralsvalue over replacement

Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.

Metrics worth highlighting

The charts that move this projection — where he broke from his own 3-year rate, where the season split in half, and where we’re taking the number next year

Second-half surge

PIM

all5v5

Penalty minutes ran at a 52 pace in the second half after 22 in the first, per 82 games.

Second-half fade

all5v5

Assists ran at a 8 pace in the second half after 13 in the first, per 82 games.

Below his 3-year rate

iSCF/60

iSCF/60 ran 47% below his 3-year rate last season (1.38 against 2.59).

Picked automatically from every chart on this card, ranked by how far each number moved. Each claim is measured off the chart drawn beside it.

Similar & complementary players

Similar makeup Defense

Closest across all seven categories — match % is the whole-profile fit

Timothy LiljegrenD · Washington Capitals87% match
shared: Blocks
Adam LarssonD · Seattle Kraken87% match
shared: Blocks, Hits
Martin FehervaryD · Washington Capitals86% match
shared: Blocks, Hits
Nick SeelerD · Philadelphia Flyers85% match
shared: Blocks, Hits

Complementary Defense

Same position, opposite profile — strong where Jamie Oleksiak is weak or average, light where he’s strong

Quinn HughesD · Minnesota Wildcovers 3
fills: A, PPP, SOG
Zach WerenskiD · Columbus Blue Jacketscovers 3
fills: SOG, A, PPP
Cale MakarD · Colorado Avalanchecovers 3
fills: A, PPP, SOG
Evan BouchardD · Edmonton Oilerscovers 3
fills: A, PPP, SOG

Profile shape — per-82 category values vs the league p99 for the position (same scale as the hero bars)

This player

the profile below

vs Similar

similar players hug the shape

vs Complementary

complements fill the gaps

Deployment

Deployment projection — next-year TOI & PP TOI vs the last two years (the role that drives every count)

Coaching

2026-27 · Manny Malhotra (VAN) new voice

Last year (SEA, traded): Lane Lambert full season (1st yr) — no change

Metric	26-27 proj	2025-26	Prev 3	Diff
TOI	17.55	16.93	19.22	-12%
5v5 TOI	15.23	15.03	15.81	-5%
PP TOI	0.04	0.03	0.06	-52%

By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline

GP 20 · 17 · 23 · 18

TOI*

5v5 TOI

PP TOI

*Total TOI by quarter reconstructs 5v5+PP quarterly totals plus a held-flat season PK/GP — NST has no all-strength quarterly export. Level is accurate; quarter-to-quarter movement comes from 5v5+PP.

By season — year over year

TOI

5v5 TOI

PP TOI

TOI → 17.55: holds last year's role
5v5 TOI → 15.23: holds last year's role
PP TOI → 0.04: role tapered late (Q4 0.0 vs 0.0 full-year) — projected toward the softer finish

Shooting — volume & conversion

How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).

Metric (5v5)	26-27 proj	2025-26	Prev 3	Diff
SOG/60	3.72	3.84	3.75	+2%
G/60	0.22	0.26	0.21	+26%
iSH%	5.87	6.77	5.49	+23%
ixG/60	–	0.16	0.19	-16%
iCF/60	–	8.24	8.35	-1%
iSCF/60	–	1.38	2.59	-47%
iHDCF/60	–	0.41	0.60	-32%

By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline

GP 20 · 17 · 23 · 18

SOG/60

iSH%

ixG/60

iCF/60

iSCF/60

iHDCF/60

By season — year over year

SOG/60

iSH%

ixG/60

iCF/60

iSCF/60

iHDCF/60

Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection

all5v5

SOG

all5v5

The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.

Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)

RiskGoals projected DOWN: iSH% ran hot at 6.8% vs a 5.5% 3-yr mark while 5v5 ixG/60 0.16 (16th pct league-wide) was flat — finishing, not process. Regressing iSH% toward 5.9% pulls the goal rate ~16% down.

ContextTrajectory: 5v5 ixG/60 fell from 0.20 (1st half) to 0.15 (2nd).

RiskAge 33 — modest past-prime drag on scoring rates.

Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense

Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.

Metric (5v5)	26-27 proj	2025-26	Prev 3	Diff
on-ice SH%	9.18	9.58	8.69	+10%
IPP	30.51	29.13	32.20	-10%
1A/60	0.18	0.10	0.27	-63%
2A/60	0.26	0.31	0.30	+3%

By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline

GP 20 · 17 · 23 · 18

1A/60

2A/60

By season — year over year

1A/60

2A/60

Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection

all5v5

PTS

all5v5

Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)

ContextAssist environment looks normal (on-ice SH% 9.6%, IPP 29.1%).

ContextDefenseman — weight transition/PP facilitation over raw 2A; secondary assists read a touch better for D than forwards.

Power play

PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.

Metric	26-27 proj	2025-26	Prev 3	Diff
PP TOI	0.04	0.03	0.06	-52%
PP iSH%	–	n/a	n/a
PP SOG/60	0.00	0.00	0.00
PP ixG/60	–	0.00	0.00

By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline

GP 20 · 17 · 23 · 18

PP TOI/GP

PP SOG/60

PP ixG/60

By season — year over year

PP TOI/GP

PP SOG/60

PP ixG/60

Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection

PPP

PPG

PPA

The blue 26-27 point is our projection. PPG and PPA are the 2 halves of the PPP above them, split by the projection's own goal/assist mix. PP-only, so the halves are exact.

Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)

TailwindPP role projected up: 0.0→0.0 PP TOI/gp (role tapered late (Q4 0.0 vs 0.0 full-year) — projected toward the softer finish) — the biggest PPP lever.

Physical — PIM · hits · blocks

Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.

Metric (5v5)	26-27 proj	2025-26	Prev 3	Diff
PIMs/60	2.14	1.64	1.92	-15%
Hits/60	4.55	5.12	4.29	+19%
Blks/60	4.18	4.25	4.91	-13%

By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline

GP 20 · 17 · 23 · 18

PIMs/60

Hits/60

Blks/60

By season — year over year

PIMs/60

Hits/60

Blks/60

Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection

PIM

all5v5

HITS

all5v5

BLK

all5v5

Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)

ContextHits role-stable at 5.12/60 (61st pct league-wide) → 4.55 projected.

RiskBlocks tailing off: Q4 3.25/60 and 2nd-half 3.29 below the 4.25 season rate — projected DOWN to 4.18/60, weighting the recent decline over the 4.91 3-yr mark.

TailwindFights / takes majors (0.10/60) — a real PIM source, valuable in banger and PIM formats.