Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2670 GP | H231 GP | H139 GP | Prev 352 GP · 1y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 12.34 | 12.08 | 11.62 | 11.75 | 12.88 |
| PP TOI | 0.22 | 0.27 | 0.19 | 0.33 | 1.05 |
| G | 8 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 13 |
| A | 13 | 15 | 16 | 15 | 14 |
| PTS | 21 | 20 | 22 | 18 | 27 |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| SOG | 70 | 82 | 59 | 100 | 101 |
| PIM | 21 | 26 | 21 | 29 | 22 |
| Hits | 64 | 70 | 78 | 64 | 51 |
| Blocks | 39 | 34 | 42 | 28 | 38 |
Sample: 70 GP · 774 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Blks/60 finished the year 75% above where it started (1.73 in the first half, 3.02 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
iSH% ran 56% below his 3-year rate last season (4.64 against 10.47).
Shots ran at a 59 pace in the second half after 100 in the first, per 82 games.
PIMs/60 ran 85% above his 3-year rate last season (1.55 against 0.84).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 12.34 | 12.08 | 12.88 | -6% |
| 5v5 TOI | 11.38 | 11.07 | 10.94 | +1% |
| PP TOI | 0.22 | 0.27 | 1.05 | -75% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 4.15 | 4.96 | 5.06 | -2% |
| G/60 | 0.26 | 0.23 | 0.53 | -57% |
| iSH% | 8.02 | 4.64 | 10.47 | -56% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.56 | 0.65 | -14% |
| iCF/60 | – | 10.07 | 12.55 | -20% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 5.96 | 7.38 | -19% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 2.71 | 3.16 | -14% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 7.91 | 9.00 | 5.71 | +58% |
| IPP | 57.11 | 53.45 | 70.95 | -25% |
| 1A/60 | 0.36 | 0.54 | 0.11 | +391% |
| 2A/60 | 0.43 | 0.46 | 0.42 | +10% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.22 | 0.27 | 1.05 | -75% |
| PP iSH% | 13.01 | 0.00 | 16.68 | -100% |
| PP SOG/60 | 4.25 | 9.61 | 13.13 | -27% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.93 | 2.89 | -68% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.27 | 1.55 | 0.84 | +85% |
| Hits/60 | 4.05 | 4.57 | 3.27 | +40% |
| Blks/60 | 2.33 | 2.09 | 2.42 | -14% |