Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2671 GP | H231 GP | H140 GP | Prev 3118 GP · 2y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 16.30 | 16.42 | 15.20 | 16.23 | 17.45 |
| PP TOI | 1.43 | 1.58 | 1.30 | 1.80 | 1.43 |
| G | 19 | 15 | 21 | 10 | 28 |
| A | 20 | 21 | 11 | 29 | 22 |
| PTS | 39 | 36 | 32 | 39 | 50 |
| PPP | 6 | 7 | 0 | 12 | 6 |
| SOG | 200 | 196 | 194 | 198 | 254 |
| PIM | 93 | 106 | 102 | 109 | 96 |
| Hits | 139 | 128 | 110 | 142 | 260 |
| Blocks | 29 | 32 | 34 | 31 | 27 |
Sample: 71 GP · 1,006 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
iSH% finished the year 150% above where it started (3.71 in the first half, 12.11 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
PP SOG/60 finished the year 150% above where it started (9.04 in the first half, 23.46 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
1A/60 ran 74% above his 3-year rate last season (0.72 against 0.41).
Hits/60 ran 48% below his 3-year rate last season (6.50 against 12.48).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 16.30 | 16.42 | 17.45 | -6% |
| 5v5 TOI | 13.96 | 14.18 | 14.83 | -4% |
| PP TOI | 1.43 | 1.58 | 1.43 | +11% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 7.87 | 8.11 | 10.67 | -24% |
| G/60 | 0.64 | 0.54 | 0.99 | -46% |
| iSH% | 8.20 | 6.66 | 9.31 | -29% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.90 | 1.12 | -20% |
| iCF/60 | – | 17.46 | 19.65 | -11% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 8.11 | 11.49 | -29% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 4.35 | 5.55 | -22% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 8.64 | 9.05 | 7.81 | +16% |
| IPP | 61.91 | 59.05 | 72.75 | -19% |
| 1A/60 | 0.60 | 0.72 | 0.41 | +74% |
| 2A/60 | 0.26 | 0.12 | 0.34 | -65% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 1.43 | 1.58 | 1.43 | +11% |
| PP iSH% | 6.42 | 7.71 | 6.05 | +27% |
| PP SOG/60 | 14.57 | 13.88 | 11.74 | +18% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 1.81 | 2.09 | -13% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 4.44 | 5.01 | 3.91 | +28% |
| Hits/60 | 7.13 | 6.50 | 12.48 | -48% |
| Blks/60 | 1.37 | 1.49 | 1.20 | +24% |