Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection adj | 2025-2678 GP | H238 GP | H140 GP | Prev 3130 GP · 2y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 15.59 | 15.93 | 16.43 | 14.18 | 13.23 |
| PP TOI | 1.15 | 0.96 | 1.16 | 0.78 | 0.91 |
| G | ▲34 | 30 | 36 | 26 | 22 |
| A | 19 | 18 | 15 | 20 | 14 |
| PTS | ▲53 | 48 | 50 | 46 | 37 |
| PPP | 7 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 4 |
| SOG | ▲254 | 192 | 222 | 164 | 181 |
| PIM | 36 | 34 | 9 | 58 | 50 |
| Hits | 182 | 174 | 180 | 167 | 160 |
| Blocks | 29 | 28 | 26 | 31 | 26 |
Sample: 78 GP · 1,101 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Context-adjusted (▲/▼ vs the rate-model baseline): Baseline is his 2025-26 (SEA/TOR) season. Value hinges on holding top-line minutes; currently a strong streamer with real shot volume.
Metrics worth highlighting
Penalty minutes ran at a 9 pace in the second half after 58 in the first, per 82 games.
Goals ran at a 36 pace in the second half after 26 in the first, per 82 games.
We’re projecting shots 32% above last season, 192 to 254.
1A/60 ran 38% above his 3-year rate last season (0.54 against 0.39).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 15.59 | 15.93 | 13.23 | +20% |
| 5v5 TOI | 14.42 | 14.13 | 11.85 | +19% |
| PP TOI | 1.15 | 0.96 | 0.91 | +6% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 8.44 | 8.28 | 10.01 | -17% |
| G/60 | 0.97 | 0.98 | 1.09 | -10% |
| iSH% | 11.48 | 11.84 | 10.90 | +9% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.80 | 0.79 | +1% |
| iCF/60 | – | 15.52 | 17.06 | -9% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 7.68 | 7.56 | +2% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 3.10 | 3.31 | -6% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 10.05 | 10.03 | 10.10 | -1% |
| IPP | 66.04 | 67.42 | 62.46 | +8% |
| 1A/60 | 0.48 | 0.54 | 0.39 | +38% |
| 2A/60 | 0.32 | 0.27 | 0.39 | -31% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 1.15 | 0.96 | 0.91 | +6% |
| PP iSH% | 24.97 | 26.63 | 24.97 | +7% |
| PP SOG/60 | 11.28 | 11.98 | 8.15 | +47% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 1.92 | 1.36 | +41% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.56 | 1.74 | 2.61 | -33% |
| Hits/60 | 8.94 | 8.77 | 9.66 | -9% |
| Blks/60 | 1.32 | 1.36 | 1.60 | -15% |