Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2675 GP | H238 GP | H137 GP | Prev 3229 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 16.91 | 17.05 | 16.13 | 16.42 | 18.05 |
| PP TOI | 2.90 | 3.26 | 3.28 | 3.23 | 3.31 |
| G | 24 | 24 | 20 | 29 | 35 |
| A | 24 | 31 | 42 | 19 | 22 |
| PTS | 48 | 55 | 62 | 47 | 57 |
| PPP | 15 | 19 | 17 | 20 | 19 |
| SOG | 156 | 152 | 139 | 165 | 225 |
| PIM | 34 | 37 | 33 | 42 | 27 |
| Hits | 82 | 75 | 78 | 73 | 110 |
| Blocks | 17 | 22 | 14 | 30 | 22 |
Sample: 75 GP · 933 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Context-adjusted (▲/▼ vs the rate-model baseline): PP TOI trimmed 3.29->2.9 and moved out of the PP1 lock group (playoff usage down to 2:26).
Metrics worth highlighting
Assists ran at a 42 pace in the second half after 19 in the first, per 82 games.
1A/60 finished the year 129% above where it started (0.40 in the first half, 0.92 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
PP SOG/60 ran 40% below his 3-year rate last season (8.59 against 14.31).
PP ixG/60 ran 37% below his 3-year rate last season (2.15 against 3.41).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 16.91 | 17.05 | 18.05 | -6% |
| 5v5 TOI | 12.25 | 12.45 | 12.18 | +2% |
| PP TOI | 2.90 | 3.26 | 3.31 | -2% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 5.42 | 5.59 | 7.59 | -26% |
| G/60 | 0.57 | 0.51 | 0.88 | -42% |
| iSH% | 10.55 | 9.12 | 11.58 | -21% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.80 | 0.85 | -6% |
| iCF/60 | – | 12.60 | 14.00 | -10% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 7.97 | 8.35 | -4% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 4.69 | 4.75 | -1% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.54 | 9.66 | 9.18 | +5% |
| IPP | 51.16 | 50.00 | 54.67 | -9% |
| 1A/60 | 0.50 | 0.64 | 0.35 | +85% |
| 2A/60 | 0.32 | 0.39 | 0.30 | +30% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 2.90 | 3.26 | 3.31 | -2% |
| PP iSH% | 18.82 | 22.82 | 17.70 | +29% |
| PP SOG/60 | 9.92 | 8.59 | 14.31 | -40% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 2.15 | 3.41 | -37% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.53 | 1.54 | 1.16 | +33% |
| Hits/60 | 4.73 | 4.31 | 6.07 | -29% |
| Blks/60 | 0.74 | 0.96 | 1.08 | -11% |