Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2682 GP | H239 GP | H143 GP | Prev 3231 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 21.56 | 21.08 | 19.15 | 21.20 | 23.49 |
| PP TOI | 1.40 | 1.60 | 0.87 | 2.26 | 2.20 |
| G | 6 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 8 |
| A | 28 | 26 | 24 | 28 | 37 |
| PTS | 34 | 30 | 30 | 29 | 45 |
| PPP | 7 | 9 | 2 | 15 | 14 |
| SOG | 90 | 91 | 72 | 108 | 116 |
| PIM | 10 | 14 | 4 | 23 | 18 |
| Hits | 10 | 9 | 6 | 11 | 24 |
| Blocks | 86 | 72 | 64 | 79 | 106 |
Sample: 82 GP · 1,430 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Power play points ran at a 2 pace in the second half after 15 in the first, per 82 games.
PP TOI finished the year 62% below where it started (2.27 in the first half, 0.86 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
iSH% ran 32% below his 3-year rate last season (4.30 against 6.34).
We’re projecting blocks 19% above last season, 72 to 86.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 21.56 | 21.08 | 23.49 | -10% |
| 5v5 TOI | 17.41 | 17.44 | 17.81 | -2% |
| PP TOI | 1.40 | 1.60 | 2.20 | -27% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 2.88 | 3.02 | 3.25 | -7% |
| G/60 | 0.17 | 0.13 | 0.21 | -37% |
| iSH% | 5.73 | 4.30 | 6.34 | -32% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.13 | 0.15 | -16% |
| iCF/60 | – | 8.14 | 7.64 | +7% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 2.35 | 2.38 | -1% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 0.25 | 0.39 | -37% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 8.56 | 8.78 | 8.28 | +6% |
| IPP | 36.92 | 33.48 | 42.53 | -21% |
| 1A/60 | 0.38 | 0.29 | 0.39 | -26% |
| 2A/60 | 0.35 | 0.34 | 0.36 | -7% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 1.40 | 1.60 | 2.20 | -27% |
| PP iSH% | 9.92 | 8.38 | 10.40 | -19% |
| PP SOG/60 | 5.33 | 5.49 | 9.10 | -40% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.31 | 0.56 | -45% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 0.41 | 0.59 | 0.61 | -4% |
| Hits/60 | 0.42 | 0.38 | 0.86 | -56% |
| Blks/60 | 2.62 | 2.27 | 3.14 | -28% |