Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2627 GP | H211 GP | H116 GP | Prev 3thin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 16.40 | 15.74 | 15.36 | 15.71 | – |
| PP TOI | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.07 | – |
| G | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – |
| A | 10 | 9 | -0 | 15 | – |
| PTS | 10 | 9 | -0 | 15 | – |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – |
| SOG | 51 | 46 | 74 | 31 | – |
| PIM | 37 | 36 | 33 | 41 | – |
| Hits | 47 | 46 | 41 | 46 | – |
| Blocks | 123 | 119 | 135 | 115 | – |
Sample: 27 GP · 383 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Blks/60 finished the year 28% above where it started (5.00 in the first half, 6.41 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
SOG/60 sits in the 2th percentile league-wide (2.35).
Penalty minutes ran at a 33 pace in the second half after 41 in the first, per 82 games.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 16.40 | 15.74 | n/a | |
| 5v5 TOI | 14.75 | 14.19 | n/a | |
| PP TOI | 0.06 | 0.06 | n/a |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 2.58 | 2.35 | n/a | |
| G/60 | 0.00 | 0.00 | n/a | |
| iSH% | 0.00 | 0.00 | n/a | |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.12 | n/a | |
| iCF/60 | – | 6.42 | n/a | |
| iSCF/60 | – | 1.57 | n/a | |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 0.31 | n/a |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 11.06 | 11.06 | n/a | |
| IPP | 18.73 | 18.73 | n/a | |
| 1A/60 | 0.16 | 0.16 | n/a | |
| 2A/60 | 0.31 | 0.31 | n/a |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.06 | 0.06 | n/a | |
| PP iSH% | – | n/a | n/a | |
| PP SOG/60 | 0.00 | 0.00 | n/a | |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.00 | n/a |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.88 | 1.88 | n/a | |
| Hits/60 | 2.35 | 2.35 | n/a | |
| Blks/60 | 5.59 | 5.48 | n/a |