Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2650 GP | H227 GP | H123 GP | Prev 330 GP · 1y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 17.20 | 17.14 | 17.47 | 16.16 | 18.07 |
| PP TOI | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.67 |
| G | 6 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 5 |
| A | 15 | 11 | 9 | 14 | 19 |
| PTS | 21 | 20 | 18 | 21 | 24 |
| PPP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| SOG | 80 | 80 | 94 | 64 | 82 |
| PIM | 25 | 36 | 30 | 43 | 22 |
| Hits | 64 | 57 | 73 | 39 | 68 |
| Blocks | 123 | 103 | 105 | 102 | 140 |
Sample: 50 GP · 769 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Hits ran at a 73 pace in the second half after 39 in the first, per 82 games.
We’re projecting assists 36% above last season, 11 to 15.
iSH% ran 45% above his 3-year rate last season (10.21 against 7.04).
SOG/60 finished the year 33% above where it started (3.25 in the first half, 4.31 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 17.20 | 17.14 | 18.07 | -5% |
| 5v5 TOI | 15.59 | 15.40 | 15.77 | -2% |
| PP TOI | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.67 | -91% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 3.87 | 3.82 | 3.55 | +8% |
| G/60 | 0.31 | 0.39 | 0.25 | +56% |
| iSH% | 7.99 | 10.21 | 7.04 | +45% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.15 | 0.20 | -25% |
| iCF/60 | – | 8.81 | 9.89 | -11% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 2.34 | 3.68 | -36% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 0.47 | 0.89 | -47% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 8.07 | 9.84 | 6.88 | +43% |
| IPP | 45.40 | 40.17 | 53.94 | -26% |
| 1A/60 | 0.24 | 0.23 | 0.25 | -8% |
| 2A/60 | 0.36 | 0.31 | 0.38 | -18% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.09 | 0.06 | 0.67 | -91% |
| PP iSH% | – | n/a | 0.00 | |
| PP SOG/60 | 0.60 | 0.00 | 3.00 | -100% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.00 | 0.33 | -100% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.42 | 1.71 | 1.01 | +69% |
| Hits/60 | 2.97 | 2.73 | 3.17 | -14% |
| Blks/60 | 4.41 | 4.13 | 4.82 | -14% |