Per 82 GP	2026-27projection	2025-2676 GP	H237 GP	H139 GP	Prev 3193 GP · 3y
TOI	16.65	16.52	15.50	16.90	17.17
PP TOI	0.06	0.04	0.03	0.05	0.24
G	4	5	3	7	4
A	9	7	9	6	11
PTS	13	13	12	14	15
PPP	0	0	0	0	1
SOG	70	67	65	68	84
PIM	49	41	46	36	53
Hits	107	113	100	126	136
Blocks	102	98	88	108	112

Sample: 76 GP · 1,115 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates

Positional rankingDefense · league-wide (of 303)

194Philippe Myers-25

195Ryan McDonagh-25

196Elias Salomonsson-25

197Carson Soucy-25

198Shakir Mukhamadullin-25

199Jaccob Slavin-26

200Ryan Graves-26

offenseperipheralsvalue over replacement

Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.

Metrics worth highlighting

The charts that move this projection — where he broke from his own 3-year rate, where the season split in half, and where we’re taking the number next year

Second-half fade

iSH%

iSH% finished the year 66% below where it started (9.60 in the first half, 3.27 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.

Second-half fade

iSCF/60

iSCF/60 finished the year 50% below where it started (2.56 in the first half, 1.27 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.

Picked automatically from every chart on this card, ranked by how far each number moved. Each claim is measured off the chart drawn beside it.

Similar & complementary players

Similar makeup Defense

Closest across all seven categories — match % is the whole-profile fit

Brenden DillonD · New Jersey Devils82% match
shared: Hits
Connor CliftonD · Boston Bruins81% match
shared: Hits
Maveric LamoureuxD · Utah Mammoth81% match
shared: Hits
Timothy LiljegrenD · Washington Capitals81% match

Complementary Defense

Same position, opposite profile — strong where Carson Soucy is weak or average, light where he’s strong

Zach WerenskiD · Columbus Blue Jacketscovers 3
fills: SOG, A, PPP
Cale MakarD · Colorado Avalanchecovers 3
fills: A, PPP, SOG
Quinn HughesD · Minnesota Wildcovers 3
fills: A, PPP, SOG
Evan BouchardD · Edmonton Oilerscovers 3
fills: A, PPP, SOG

Profile shape — per-82 category values vs the league p99 for the position (same scale as the hero bars)

This player

the profile below

vs Similar

similar players hug the shape

vs Complementary

complements fill the gaps

Deployment

Deployment projection — next-year TOI & PP TOI vs the last two years (the role that drives every count)

Coaching

2026-27 · Peter DeBoer (NYI)

Last year (NYR, traded): Peter DeBoer NYI · pre-trade → Mike Sullivan NYR · acquired mid-season (small sample) — in-season change

Metric	26-27 proj	2025-26	Prev 3	Diff
TOI	16.65	16.52	17.17	-4%
5v5 TOI	14.50	14.68	14.78	-1%
PP TOI	0.06	0.04	0.24	-84%

By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline

GP 18 · 21 · 19 · 18

TOI*

5v5 TOI

PP TOI

*Total TOI by quarter reconstructs 5v5+PP quarterly totals plus a held-flat season PK/GP — NST has no all-strength quarterly export. Level is accurate; quarter-to-quarter movement comes from 5v5+PP.

By season — year over year

TOI

5v5 TOI

PP TOI

TOI → 16.65: holds last year's role
5v5 TOI → 14.50: holds last year's role
PP TOI → 0.06: role tapered late (Q4 0.0 vs 0.0 full-year) — projected toward the softer finish

Shooting — volume & conversion

How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).

Metric (5v5)	26-27 proj	2025-26	Prev 3	Diff
SOG/60	3.07	3.17	3.97	-20%
G/60	0.16	0.22	0.17	+31%
iSH%	5.04	6.94	4.22	+64%
ixG/60	–	0.16	0.18	-13%
iCF/60	–	8.34	9.74	-14%
iSCF/60	–	1.99	2.27	-12%
iHDCF/60	–	0.48	0.31	+52%

By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline

GP 18 · 21 · 19 · 18

SOG/60

iSH%

ixG/60

iCF/60

iSCF/60

iHDCF/60

By season — year over year

SOG/60

iSH%

ixG/60

iCF/60

iSCF/60

iHDCF/60

Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection

all5v5

SOG

all5v5

The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.

Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)

RiskGoals projected DOWN: iSH% ran hot at 6.9% vs a 4.2% 3-yr mark while 5v5 ixG/60 0.16 (16th pct league-wide) was flat — finishing, not process. Regressing iSH% toward 5.0% pulls the goal rate ~28% down.

RiskShot volume down 20% (5v5 SOG/60 3.17 vs 3.97) — volume is the repeatable half, so this caps the goal ceiling.

RiskAge 32 — modest past-prime drag on scoring rates.

Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense

Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.

Metric (5v5)	26-27 proj	2025-26	Prev 3	Diff
on-ice SH%	8.45	8.25	9.08	-9%
IPP	30.77	31.38	28.91	+9%
1A/60	0.16	0.16	0.17	-6%
2A/60	0.28	0.22	0.33	-34%

By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline

GP 18 · 21 · 19 · 18

1A/60

2A/60

By season — year over year

1A/60

2A/60

Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection

all5v5

PTS

all5v5

Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)

ContextAssist environment looks normal (on-ice SH% 8.2%, IPP 31.4%).

TailwindHigh-danger setups up (iHDCF/60 0.48 vs 0.31) — the dangerous chances that turn into primary assists are trending up.

ContextDefenseman — weight transition/PP facilitation over raw 2A; secondary assists read a touch better for D than forwards.

Power play

PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.

Metric	26-27 proj	2025-26	Prev 3	Diff
PP TOI	0.06	0.04	0.24	-84%
PP iSH%	–	n/a	25.02
PP SOG/60	1.29	0.00	5.16	-100%
PP ixG/60	–	0.00	0.27	-100%

By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline

GP 18 · 21 · 19 · 18

PP TOI/GP

PP SOG/60

PP ixG/60

By season — year over year

PP TOI/GP

PP SOG/60

PP ixG/60

Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection

PPP

PPG

PPA

The blue 26-27 point is our projection. PPG and PPA are the 2 halves of the PPP above them, split by the projection's own goal/assist mix. PP-only, so the halves are exact.

Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)

TailwindPP role projected up: 0.0→0.1 PP TOI/gp (role tapered late (Q4 0.0 vs 0.0 full-year) — projected toward the softer finish) — the biggest PPP lever.

Physical — PIM · hits · blocks

Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.

Metric (5v5)	26-27 proj	2025-26	Prev 3	Diff
PIMs/60	2.30	1.94	2.61	-26%
Hits/60	4.61	4.84	5.80	-17%
Blks/60	4.01	3.93	4.44	-11%

By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline

GP 18 · 21 · 19 · 18

PIMs/60

Hits/60

Blks/60

By season — year over year

PIMs/60

Hits/60

Blks/60

Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection

PIM

all5v5

HITS

all5v5

BLK

all5v5

Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)

RiskHits tailing off: Q4 2.75/60 and 2nd-half 4.43 below the 4.84 season rate — projected DOWN to 4.61/60, weighting the recent decline over the 5.80 3-yr mark.

RiskBlocks tailing off: Q4 2.75/60 and 2nd-half 3.60 below the 3.93 season rate — projected DOWN to 4.01/60, weighting the recent decline over the 4.44 3-yr mark.