Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.

Metrics worth highlighting

The charts that move this projection — where he broke from his own 3-year rate, where the season split in half, and where we’re taking the number next year

We project it up

all5v5

We’re projecting assists 64% above last season, 14 to 23.

Second-half fade

Hits/60

Hits/60 finished the year 48% below where it started (1.73 in the first half, 0.91 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.

We project it up

PP TOI

We’re projecting PP TOI 28% above last season, 0.84 to 1.08.

Second-half fade

SOG

all5v5

Shots ran at a 61 pace in the second half after 95 in the first, per 82 games.

Picked automatically from every chart on this card, ranked by how far each number moved. Each claim is measured off the chart drawn beside it.

Similar & complementary players

Similar makeup Defense

Closest across all seven categories — match % is the whole-profile fit

Owen PowerD · Buffalo Sabres80% match
Dmitry OrlovD · San Jose Sharks78% match
Vladislav GavrikovD · New York Rangers77% match
Rasmus RistolainenD · Philadelphia Flyers76% match

Complementary Defense

Same position, opposite profile — strong where Matt Grzelcyk is weak or average, light where he’s strong

Dougie HamiltonD · New Jersey Devilscovers 4
fills: SOG, PPP, A, Hits
Zach WerenskiD · Columbus Blue Jacketscovers 3
fills: SOG, A, PPP
Cale MakarD · Colorado Avalanchecovers 3
fills: A, PPP, SOG
Evan BouchardD · Edmonton Oilerscovers 3
fills: A, PPP, SOG

Profile shape — per-82 category values vs the league p99 for the position (same scale as the hero bars)

This player

the profile below

vs Similar

similar players hug the shape

vs Complementary

complements fill the gaps

Deployment

Deployment projection — next-year TOI & PP TOI vs the last two years (the role that drives every count)

Coaching

2026-27 · Jeff Blashill (CHI)

Last year: Jeff Blashill full season (1st yr) — no change

Metric	26-27 proj	2025-26	Prev 3	Diff
TOI	17.30	16.97	18.60	-9%
5v5 TOI	14.94	15.03	16.37	-8%
PP TOI	1.08	0.84	0.97	-13%

By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline

GP 20 · 21 · 22 · 6

TOI*

5v5 TOI

PP TOI

*Total TOI by quarter reconstructs 5v5+PP quarterly totals plus a held-flat season PK/GP — NST has no all-strength quarterly export. Level is accurate; quarter-to-quarter movement comes from 5v5+PP.

By season — year over year

TOI

5v5 TOI

PP TOI

TOI → 17.30: holds last year's role
5v5 TOI → 14.94: role tapered late (Q4 13.8 vs 15.0 full-year) — projected toward the softer finish
PP TOI → 1.08: same coach (Jeff Blashill) — carries the elevated finish (2nd half 1.3, Q4 1.3) over the full-year 0.8

Shooting — volume & conversion

How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).

Metric (5v5)	26-27 proj	2025-26	Prev 3	Diff
SOG/60	3.37	3.47	3.65	-5%
G/60	0.00	0.00	0.08	-100%
iSH%	1.57	0.00	2.24	-100%
ixG/60	–	0.09	0.15	-42%
iCF/60	–	8.04	9.11	-12%
iSCF/60	–	0.87	2.23	-61%
iHDCF/60	–	0.00	0.28	-100%

By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline

GP 20 · 21 · 22 · 6

SOG/60

iSH%

ixG/60

iCF/60

iSCF/60

iHDCF/60

By season — year over year

SOG/60

iSH%

ixG/60

iCF/60

iSCF/60

iHDCF/60

Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection

all5v5

SOG

all5v5

The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.

Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)

ContextFinishing looks earned: iSH% 0.0% sits near the 2.2% 3-yr mark with 5v5 ixG/60 0.09 (2nd pct league-wide) — goals held close to last year.

ContextTrajectory: 5v5 ixG/60 fell from 0.10 (1st half) to 0.08 (2nd).

RiskAge 32 — modest past-prime drag on scoring rates.

Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense

Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.

Metric (5v5)	26-27 proj	2025-26	Prev 3	Diff
on-ice SH%	9.94	9.98	9.90	+1%
IPP	22.09	15.77	32.39	-51%
1A/60	0.40	0.35	0.45	-22%
2A/60	0.27	0.06	0.40	-85%

By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline

GP 20 · 21 · 22 · 6

1A/60

2A/60

By season — year over year

1A/60

2A/60

Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection

all5v5

PTS

all5v5

Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)

TailwindIPP 15.8% sits below the 32.4% 3-yr mark — participation should rebound, nudging assists up.

ContextDefenseman — weight transition/PP facilitation over raw 2A; secondary assists read a touch better for D than forwards.

Power play

PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.

Metric	26-27 proj	2025-26	Prev 3	Diff
PP TOI	1.08	0.84	0.97	-13%
PP iSH%	0.00	0.00	0.00
PP SOG/60	5.31	5.15	7.00	-26%
PP ixG/60	–	0.49	0.39	+27%

By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline

GP 20 · 21 · 22 · 6

PP TOI/GP

PP SOG/60

PP ixG/60

By season — year over year

PP TOI/GP

PP SOG/60

PP ixG/60

Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection

PPP

PPG

PPA

The blue 26-27 point is our projection. PPG and PPA are the 2 halves of the PPP above them, split by the projection's own goal/assist mix. PP-only, so the halves are exact.

Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)

TailwindPP role projected up: 0.8→1.1 PP TOI/gp (same coach (Jeff Blashill) — carries the elevated finish (2nd half 1.3, Q4 1.3) over the full-year 0.8) — the biggest PPP lever.

TailwindPP chance quality up (PP ixG/60 0.49 vs 0.39) — a real process gain, the kind that sustains PP points.

Physical — PIM · hits · blocks

Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.

Metric (5v5)	26-27 proj	2025-26	Prev 3	Diff
PIMs/60	1.92	1.85	1.01	+83%
Hits/60	1.34	1.45	2.30	-37%
Blks/60	2.75	2.95	3.75	-21%

By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline

GP 20 · 21 · 22 · 6

PIMs/60

Hits/60

Blks/60

By season — year over year

PIMs/60

Hits/60

Blks/60

Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection

PIM

all5v5

HITS

all5v5

BLK

all5v5

Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)

RiskHits tailing off: Q4 0.72/60 and 2nd-half 0.91 below the 1.45 season rate — projected DOWN to 1.34/60, weighting the recent decline over the 2.30 3-yr mark.

RiskBlocks tailing off: Q4 1.45/60 and 2nd-half 2.27 below the 2.95 season rate — projected DOWN to 2.75/60, weighting the recent decline over the 3.75 3-yr mark.