🏒@HockeyBangers2026-27 projections

Overview

@HockeyBangers

2026-27 Projection

Kaedan Korczak

PIT · Age 25.5 · 🇨🇦 Canada · 6′3″, 202 lb · Draft 2019, 41st overall (VGK)
PITteam
Dposition
264position rank
734skater rank
-46overall
-54offense
8peripherals

Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.

Per 82 GP2026-27projection2025-2678 GPH239 GPH139 GPPrev 366 GP · 2y
TOI15.9315.9714.9616.4315.64
PP TOI0.040.040.020.070.15
G13-061
A1714121622
PTS1817122224
PPP00001
SOG6662537082
PIM1627213412
Hits9910783131127
Blocks851007912188

Sample: 78 GP · 1,185 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates

Positional rankingDefense · league-wide (of 303)
offenseperipheralsvalue over replacement

Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.

Metrics worth highlighting

The charts that move this projection — where he broke from his own 3-year rate, where the season split in half, and where we’re taking the number next year
Second-half fade
PTS
1822-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5

Points ran at a 12 pace in the second half after 22 in the first, per 82 games.

Second-half fade
HITS
9922-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5

Hits ran at a 83 pace in the second half after 131 in the first, per 82 games.

We project it down
PIM
1622-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5

We’re projecting penalty minutes 41% below last season, 27 to 16.

Below his 3-year rate
1A/60
0.3022-2323-2424-2525-26

1A/60 ran 38% below his 3-year rate last season (0.30 against 0.49).

Picked automatically from every chart on this card, ranked by how far each number moved. Each claim is measured off the chart drawn beside it.

Similar & complementary players

Similar makeup Defense
Closest across all seven categories — match % is the whole-profile fit
Complementary Defense
Same position, opposite profile — strong where Kaedan Korczak is weak or average, light where he’s strong
Profile shape — per-82 category values vs the league p99 for the position (same scale as the hero bars)
This player
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
the profile below
vs Similar
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
similar players hug the shape
vs Complementary
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
complements fill the gaps

Deployment

Deployment projection — next-year TOI & PP TOI vs the last two years (the role that drives every count)
Coaching
2026-27 · Dan Muse (PIT)
Last year (VGK, traded): Bruce Cassidy Q1-Q4 · fired Mar 29 → John Tortorella final 8 games · Q4 — in-season change
Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
TOI15.9315.9715.64+2%
5v5 TOI14.3515.2014.99+1%
PP TOI0.040.040.15-72%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 19 · 25 · 14
TOI*
3-yr 15.6413.19Q1Q2Q3Q4
5v5 TOI
3-yr 14.9912.73Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP TOI
3-yr 0.150.01Q1Q2Q3Q4
*Total TOI by quarter reconstructs 5v5+PP quarterly totals plus a held-flat season PK/GP — NST has no all-strength quarterly export. Level is accurate; quarter-to-quarter movement comes from 5v5+PP.
By season — year over year
TOI
15.9322-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
5v5 TOI
14.3522-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
PP TOI
0.0422-2323-2424-2525-2626-27

Shooting — volume & conversion

How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
SOG/602.892.943.70-21%
G/600.110.150.06+147%
iSH%3.375.101.64+211%
ixG/600.150.12+25%
iCF/607.499.65-22%
iSCF/602.432.67-9%
iHDCF/600.560.00
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 19 · 25 · 14
SOG/60
3-yr 3.702.36Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSH%
3-yr 1.640.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
ixG/60
3-yr 0.120.05Q1Q2Q3Q4
iCF/60
3-yr 9.655.72Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSCF/60
3-yr 2.671.68Q1Q2Q3Q4
iHDCF/60
3-yr 0.000.34Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
SOG/60
2.9422-2323-2424-2525-26
iSH%
5.1022-2323-2424-2525-26
ixG/60
0.1522-2323-2424-2525-26
iCF/60
7.4922-2323-2424-2525-26
iSCF/60
2.4322-2323-2424-2525-26
iHDCF/60
0.5622-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
G
122-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
SOG
6622-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
TailwindProcess rising: 5v5 ixG/60 0.15 (13th pct league-wide) up on the 3-yr 0.12 — the shot quality is real, so the projected goal rate leans on chances, not a hot %.
RiskShot volume down 21% (5v5 SOG/60 2.94 vs 3.70) — volume is the repeatable half, so this caps the goal ceiling.
ContextTrajectory: 5v5 ixG/60 fell from 0.17 (1st half) to 0.10 (2nd).

Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense

Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
on-ice SH%10.7210.5610.91-3%
IPP31.7029.4635.36-17%
1A/600.380.300.49-38%
2A/600.450.300.55-45%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 19 · 25 · 14
1A/60
3-yr 0.490.34Q1Q2Q3Q4
2A/60
3-yr 0.550.34Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
1A/60
0.3022-2323-2424-2525-26
2A/60
0.3022-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
A
1722-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
PTS
1822-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
TailwindIPP 29.5% sits below the 35.4% 3-yr mark — participation should rebound, nudging assists up.
ContextDefenseman — weight transition/PP facilitation over raw 2A; secondary assists read a touch better for D than forwards.

Power play

PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.

Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PP TOI0.040.040.15-72%
PP iSH%n/a0.00
PP SOG/602.400.0011.98-100%
PP ixG/600.000.46-100%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 19 · 25 · 14
PP TOI/GP
3-yr 0.150.01Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP SOG/60
3-yr 11.980.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP ixG/60
3-yr 0.460.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PP TOI/GP
0.0422-2323-2424-2525-26
PP SOG/60
0.0022-2323-2424-2525-26
PP ixG/60
0.0022-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PPP
022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPG
022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPA
022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. PPG and PPA are the 2 halves of the PPP above them, split by the projection's own goal/assist mix. PP-only, so the halves are exact.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextPP role steady at ~0.0 PP TOI/gp.

Physical — PIM · hits · blocks

Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PIMs/601.151.320.61+118%
Hits/604.945.016.13-18%
Blks/604.104.504.07+11%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 19 · 25 · 14
PIMs/60
3-yr 0.612.02Q1Q2Q3Q4
Hits/60
3-yr 6.133.70Q1Q2Q3Q4
Blks/60
3-yr 4.073.37Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PIMs/60
1.3222-2323-2424-2525-26
Hits/60
5.0122-2323-2424-2525-26
Blks/60
4.5022-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PIM
1622-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
HITS
9922-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
BLK
8522-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
RiskHits tailing off: Q4 3.70/60 and 2nd-half 3.95 below the 5.01 season rate — projected DOWN to 4.94/60, weighting the recent decline over the 6.13 3-yr mark.
RiskBlocks tailing off: Q4 3.37/60 and 2nd-half 3.62 below the 4.50 season rate — projected DOWN to 4.10/60, weighting the recent decline over the 4.07 3-yr mark.