Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2678 GP | H239 GP | H139 GP | Prev 366 GP · 2y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 15.93 | 15.97 | 14.96 | 16.43 | 15.64 |
| PP TOI | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.15 |
| G | 1 | 3 | -0 | 6 | 1 |
| A | 17 | 14 | 12 | 16 | 22 |
| PTS | 18 | 17 | 12 | 22 | 24 |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| SOG | 66 | 62 | 53 | 70 | 82 |
| PIM | 16 | 27 | 21 | 34 | 12 |
| Hits | 99 | 107 | 83 | 131 | 127 |
| Blocks | 85 | 100 | 79 | 121 | 88 |
Sample: 78 GP · 1,185 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
Points ran at a 12 pace in the second half after 22 in the first, per 82 games.
Hits ran at a 83 pace in the second half after 131 in the first, per 82 games.
We’re projecting penalty minutes 41% below last season, 27 to 16.
1A/60 ran 38% below his 3-year rate last season (0.30 against 0.49).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 15.93 | 15.97 | 15.64 | +2% |
| 5v5 TOI | 14.35 | 15.20 | 14.99 | +1% |
| PP TOI | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.15 | -72% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 2.89 | 2.94 | 3.70 | -21% |
| G/60 | 0.11 | 0.15 | 0.06 | +147% |
| iSH% | 3.37 | 5.10 | 1.64 | +211% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.15 | 0.12 | +25% |
| iCF/60 | – | 7.49 | 9.65 | -22% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 2.43 | 2.67 | -9% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 0.56 | 0.00 |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 10.72 | 10.56 | 10.91 | -3% |
| IPP | 31.70 | 29.46 | 35.36 | -17% |
| 1A/60 | 0.38 | 0.30 | 0.49 | -38% |
| 2A/60 | 0.45 | 0.30 | 0.55 | -45% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.04 | 0.04 | 0.15 | -72% |
| PP iSH% | – | n/a | 0.00 | |
| PP SOG/60 | 2.40 | 0.00 | 11.98 | -100% |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.00 | 0.46 | -100% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 1.15 | 1.32 | 0.61 | +118% |
| Hits/60 | 4.94 | 5.01 | 6.13 | -18% |
| Blks/60 | 4.10 | 4.50 | 4.07 | +11% |