🏒@HockeyBangers2026-27 projections

Overview

@HockeyBangers

2026-27 Projection

Josh Manson

COL · Age 34.8 · 🇺🇸 USA · 6′3″, 218 lb · Draft 2011, 160th overall (ANA)
COLteam
Dposition
43position rank
180skater rank
36overall
-42offense
78peripherals

Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.

Per 82 GP2026-27projection2025-2679 GPH239 GPH140 GPPrev 3151 GP · 3y
TOI17.8017.7817.3617.4117.85
PP TOI0.060.070.110.020.04
G55556
A2427282621
PTS2932333127
PPP00001
SOG128133152114124
PIM80958910085
Hits179181162199206
Blocks10210399107112

Sample: 79 GP · 1,212 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates

Positional rankingDefense · league-wide (of 303)
offenseperipheralsvalue over replacement

Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.

Metrics worth highlighting

The charts that move this projection — where he broke from his own 3-year rate, where the season split in half, and where we’re taking the number next year
Second-half surge
SOG
12822-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5

Shots ran at a 152 pace in the second half after 114 in the first, per 82 games.

Second-half fade
iSH%
3-yr 4.560.00Q1Q2Q3Q4

iSH% finished the year 29% below where it started (3.88 in the first half, 2.75 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.

Above his 3-year rate
1A/60
0.6422-2323-2424-2525-26

1A/60 ran 25% above his 3-year rate last season (0.64 against 0.51).

Picked automatically from every chart on this card, ranked by how far each number moved. Each claim is measured off the chart drawn beside it.

Similar & complementary players

Similar makeup Defense
Closest across all seven categories — match % is the whole-profile fit
Complementary Defense
Same position, opposite profile — strong where Josh Manson is weak or average, light where he’s strong
  • Cale MakarD · Colorado Avalanchecovers 3
    fills: A, PPP, SOG
  • Zach WerenskiD · Columbus Blue Jacketscovers 3
    fills: SOG, A, PPP
  • Quinn HughesD · Minnesota Wildcovers 3
    fills: A, PPP, SOG
  • Evan BouchardD · Edmonton Oilerscovers 3
    fills: A, PPP, SOG
Profile shape — per-82 category values vs the league p99 for the position (same scale as the hero bars)
This player
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
the profile below
vs Similar
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
similar players hug the shape
vs Complementary
GAPPPSOGPIMHitsBlocks
complements fill the gaps

Deployment

Deployment projection — next-year TOI & PP TOI vs the last two years (the role that drives every count)
Coaching
2026-27 · Jared Bednar (COL)
Last year: Jared Bednar full season — no change
Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
TOI17.8017.7817.85-0%
5v5 TOI15.2115.3515.56-1%
PP TOI0.060.070.04+84%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 20 · 22 · 17
TOI*
3-yr 17.8516.50Q1Q2Q3Q4
5v5 TOI
3-yr 15.5614.52Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP TOI
3-yr 0.040.02Q1Q2Q3Q4
*Total TOI by quarter reconstructs 5v5+PP quarterly totals plus a held-flat season PK/GP — NST has no all-strength quarterly export. Level is accurate; quarter-to-quarter movement comes from 5v5+PP.
By season — year over year
TOI
17.8022-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
5v5 TOI
15.2122-2323-2424-2525-2626-27
PP TOI
0.0622-2323-2424-2525-2626-27

Shooting — volume & conversion

How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
SOG/605.835.945.62+6%
G/600.230.200.26-22%
iSH%3.973.374.56-26%
ixG/600.310.23+35%
iCF/6012.4213.25-6%
iSCF/603.563.83-7%
iHDCF/600.940.82+15%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 20 · 22 · 17
SOG/60
3-yr 5.627.54Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSH%
3-yr 4.560.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
ixG/60
3-yr 0.230.30Q1Q2Q3Q4
iCF/60
3-yr 13.2514.59Q1Q2Q3Q4
iSCF/60
3-yr 3.832.92Q1Q2Q3Q4
iHDCF/60
3-yr 0.820.97Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
SOG/60
5.9422-2323-2424-2525-26
iSH%
3.3722-2323-2424-2525-26
ixG/60
0.3122-2323-2424-2525-26
iCF/60
12.4222-2323-2424-2525-26
iSCF/60
3.5622-2323-2424-2525-26
iHDCF/60
0.9422-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
G
522-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
SOG
12822-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
TailwindGoals projected UP: iSH% cratered to 3.4% vs 4.6% 3-yr while 5v5 ixG/60 0.31 (32nd pct league-wide) held/rose — the chances say the finishing rebounds toward 4.0%, lifting the goal rate ~16%.
RiskAge 34 — modest past-prime drag on scoring rates.

Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense

Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
on-ice SH%9.9510.289.05+14%
IPP41.1540.1743.83-8%
1A/600.560.640.51+25%
2A/600.510.590.41+44%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 20 · 22 · 17
1A/60
3-yr 0.510.49Q1Q2Q3Q4
2A/60
3-yr 0.410.49Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
1A/60
0.6422-2323-2424-2525-26
2A/60
0.5922-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
A
2422-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
PTS
2922-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextAssist environment looks normal (on-ice SH% 10.3%, IPP 40.2%).
TailwindHigh-danger setups up (iHDCF/60 0.94 vs 0.82) — the dangerous chances that turn into primary assists are trending up.
RiskAssist gain leans on secondary helpers (2A/60 0.59 vs 3-yr 0.41) — the least repeatable slice; projected back toward baseline.
ContextDefenseman — weight transition/PP facilitation over raw 2A; secondary assists read a touch better for D than forwards.

Power play

PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.

Metric26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PP TOI0.060.070.04+84%
PP iSH%0.000.00n/a
PP SOG/6025.9234.290.00
PP ixG/601.410.00
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 20 · 22 · 17
PP TOI/GP
3-yr 0.040.02Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP SOG/60
3-yr 0.000.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
PP ixG/60
3-yr 0.000.00Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PP TOI/GP
0.0722-2323-2424-2525-26
PP SOG/60
34.2922-2323-2424-2525-26
PP ixG/60
1.4122-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PPP
022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPG
022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
PPA
022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. PPG and PPA are the 2 halves of the PPP above them, split by the projection's own goal/assist mix. PP-only, so the halves are exact.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
ContextPP role steady at ~0.1 PP TOI/gp.

Physical — PIM · hits · blocks

Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.

Metric (5v5)26-27
proj
2025-26Prev 3Diff
PIMs/603.503.863.52+10%
Hits/607.297.328.63-15%
Blks/603.823.813.98-4%
By quarter — 2025-26 vs 3-yr baseline
GP  20 · 20 · 22 · 17
PIMs/60
3-yr 3.523.16Q1Q2Q3Q4
Hits/60
3-yr 8.636.56Q1Q2Q3Q4
Blks/60
3-yr 3.983.16Q1Q2Q3Q4
By season — year over year
PIMs/60
3.8622-2323-2424-2525-26
Hits/60
7.3222-2323-2424-2525-26
Blks/60
3.8122-2323-2424-2525-26
Per-82 count — 3 seasons, 2025-26 halves & 26-27 projection
PIM
8022-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
HITS
17922-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
BLK
10222-2323-2424-25H1H226-27
all5v5
The blue 26-27 point is our projection. The bold line is all situations; the muted line under it is 5v5 alone, so the gap between them is his special-teams production. Full seasons are true per-82 counts; the 2025-26 H1/H2 reconstruct all-strength from the 5v5+PP quarterly exports plus the season's held-flat PK/other. The projected 5v5 point is the engine's even-strength share of the total, converted to 5v5 by his own 5v5-to-even-strength split, so overtime and 4-on-4 scoring stays out of it.
Regression read — where next year's /60 rate lands and why (process over finishing)
RiskHits tailing off: Q4 6.56/60 and 2nd-half 6.46 below the 7.32 season rate — projected DOWN to 7.29/60, weighting the recent decline over the 8.63 3-yr mark.
RiskBlocks tailing off: Q4 3.16/60 and 2nd-half 3.56 below the 3.81 season rate — projected DOWN to 3.82/60, weighting the recent decline over the 3.98 3-yr mark.
TailwindFights / takes majors (0.20/60) — a real PIM source, valuable in banger and PIM formats.