Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2672 GP | H238 GP | H134 GP | Prev 3229 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 19.63 | 20.14 | 19.59 | 19.34 | 16.10 |
| PP TOI | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| G | 7 | 2 | 4 | -0 | 8 |
| A | 15 | 17 | 18 | 16 | 12 |
| PTS | 22 | 19 | 23 | 16 | 19 |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SOG | 114 | 113 | 113 | 113 | 106 |
| PIM | 30 | 20 | 13 | 29 | 40 |
| Hits | 54 | 41 | 43 | 39 | 72 |
| Blocks | 79 | 72 | 69 | 75 | 67 |
Sample: 72 GP · 1,230 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
iSH% ran 65% below his 3-year rate last season (2.39 against 6.90).
Hits/60 ran 58% below his 3-year rate last season (1.41 against 3.35).
We’re projecting penalty minutes 50% above last season, 20 to 30.
iSCF/60 finished the year 57% above where it started (2.08 in the first half, 3.26 in the second). The projection leans on how the season ended, so the second half counts for more.
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 19.63 | 20.14 | 16.10 | +25% |
| 5v5 TOI | 16.71 | 17.08 | 14.71 | +16% |
| PP TOI | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.05 | +20% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 4.19 | 4.19 | 5.13 | -18% |
| G/60 | 0.14 | 0.10 | 0.35 | -72% |
| iSH% | 5.54 | 2.39 | 6.90 | -65% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.19 | 0.23 | -17% |
| iCF/60 | – | 11.95 | 12.72 | -6% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 2.59 | 2.81 | -8% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 0.39 | 0.51 | -24% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.42 | 9.60 | 8.97 | +7% |
| IPP | 28.31 | 27.08 | 32.12 | -16% |
| 1A/60 | 0.25 | 0.29 | 0.21 | +36% |
| 2A/60 | 0.35 | 0.39 | 0.34 | +15% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.05 | +20% |
| PP iSH% | 0.00 | 0.00 | n/a | |
| PP SOG/60 | 3.13 | 14.17 | 0.00 | |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.33 | 0.00 |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 1.64 | -58% |
| Hits/60 | 1.90 | 1.41 | 3.35 | -58% |
| Blks/60 | 2.47 | 2.15 | 2.96 | -27% |