Overview
@HockeyBangers
Value over replacement, based on 82 games played.
Ideal for H2H 12-team banger category leagues, 16 roster spots.
| Per 82 GP | 2026-27projection | 2025-2623 GP | H23 GP | H120 GP | Prev 3176 GP · 3y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 15.22 | 15.66 | – | 14.83 | 13.69 |
| PP TOI | 0.13 | 0.11 | – | 0.20 | 0.11 |
| G | 2 | 4 | – | 4 | 2 |
| A | 14 | 7 | – | 8 | 14 |
| PTS | 16 | 11 | – | 12 | 16 |
| PPP | 0 | 0 | – | 0 | 0 |
| SOG | 76 | 54 | – | 49 | 75 |
| PIM | 43 | 57 | – | 66 | 41 |
| Hits | 110 | 93 | – | 90 | 107 |
| Blocks | 84 | 128 | – | 129 | 68 |
Sample: 23 GP · 317 5v5 min (2025-26) — how much ice time backs these rates
Counts = projected deployment × projected /60 rate, per 82 GP. Rates regress off the process metric (ixG, shot-driving), not last year's finishing %. PP points = projected PP rate (anchored on the 2nd-half PP1 role, finishing regressed) × projected PP TOI.
Metrics worth highlighting
We’re projecting blocks 34% below last season, 128 to 84.
SOG/60 ran 37% below his 3-year rate last season (2.64 against 4.21).
ixG/60 sits in the 3th percentile league-wide (0.10).
1A/60 sits in the 4th percentile league-wide (0.00).
Similar & complementary players
Deployment
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOI | 15.22 | 15.66 | 13.69 | +14% |
| 5v5 TOI | 13.57 | 13.82 | 12.87 | +7% |
| PP TOI | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.11 | +8% |
Shooting — volume & conversion
How much and how well he shoots — volume (SOG), finishing (% vs chance quality), and the individual shot-quality funnel (iCF ⊇ iSCF ⊇ iHDCF).
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOG/60 | 2.61 | 2.64 | 4.21 | -37% |
| G/60 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.11 | -100% |
| iSH% | 1.75 | 0.00 | 2.50 | -100% |
| ixG/60 | – | 0.10 | 0.18 | -46% |
| iCF/60 | – | 7.55 | 9.77 | -23% |
| iSCF/60 | – | 2.08 | 2.33 | -11% |
| iHDCF/60 | – | 0.19 | 0.35 | -45% |
Assists — playmaking & on-ice offense
Primary vs secondary helpers, plus the on-ice offense and luck signals underneath them.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on-ice SH% | 9.94 | 12.38 | 8.32 | +49% |
| IPP | 21.61 | 14.39 | 33.39 | -57% |
| 1A/60 | 0.14 | 0.00 | 0.37 | -100% |
| 2A/60 | 0.38 | 0.38 | 0.37 | +2% |
Power play
PP opportunity and finishing — modelled separately from 5v5.
| Metric | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP TOI | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.11 | +8% |
| PP iSH% | – | n/a | n/a | |
| PP SOG/60 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| PP ixG/60 | – | 0.00 | 0.21 | -100% |
Physical — PIM · hits · blocks
Peripheral counting categories. Noisier and scorer-biased — read as role over the years, not pure talent.
| Metric (5v5) | 26-27 proj | 2025-26 | Prev 3 | Diff |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIMs/60 | 2.34 | 3.02 | 2.01 | +50% |
| Hits/60 | 5.42 | 4.91 | 5.80 | -15% |
| Blks/60 | 4.08 | 4.53 | 3.50 | +29% |